- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 24,709
Then what is the NFLs need for pff at all? Why do they use them? I'm not trying to push anything. I don't own any stock in em. But I know that I'm just a regular guy and they've built a living doing what they do. But it seems like some regular guys here downplay what they do. So I continue to ask, why do so many teams use them? Unless you already answered. Then my bad. I can't keep up with all of this isMore time doesn't equate to anything other than more time. doesn't make receivers be open or open throwing lanes.
Look, PFF has come a long way from their initial evaluations when no one in the league paid them for much beyond raw data. That said, I'll continue to argue and make the same point that Belichick made which is that unless you're in a team's building and you know the call, you CANNOT know the player's responsibility and as such, any "grade" is going to be at best under informed.
The best I can do is to say that PFF is a basic tool and any FO or coach who uses them as the be all will shortly be out of a job.
You can sell them all you like, I'm not buying. Push all you like, I and others are giving you reasons based on the inherent limitations of both what and how they collect the data.
Also, as someone who built networks, if the PFF data was really all that, there'd already be a database tool for teams to create profiles from college players so they'd KNOW with a level of certainty not seen in the modern age of who will succeed making it to the next level. There is no computer modeling for this because the data isn't contextual enough at this time to create accurate models. REAL analytics is getting better and better at determining such things with greater and greater accuracy, but what must precede that is contextual data and the NFL isn't there, yet.
They're a helluva lot farther along than when PFF started, but again, if PFF were all that, you wouldn't need scouting departments or GMs. You'd just create an algorithm for team building and execute that.
That’s assuming while we are max protecting .. the 2 or three receivers that are out on routes can actually get openOkay but In the scenario, if they're in max protect and they succeed then shouldn't the qb then have time? Even if they're masking our offensive line issues with play action, roll outs, max protect, etc, shouldn't that give the qb more time (since pff is "grading" their blocking on those plays as good) shouldn't the qb be able to produce better in those plays?
Well that can be said for every team in the NFL. I think our guys struggled more than before (no number 1 reciever) but I think Coop and Bobby are open enough that our offense shouldn't have been so putried.That’s assuming while we are max protecting .. the 2 or three receivers thatb are out on routes can actually get open
You think ..... you don’t know for 100% sure ... like I’m not saying they weren’t open .. but from what I can recollect there weren’t many plays this year off the top of my head where dudes were running wide open .. goff had to fit some throws into tights windows ..Well that can be said for every team in the NFL. I think our guys struggled more than before (no number 1 reciever) but I think Coop and Bobby are open enough that our offense shouldn't have been so putried.
I hear you. Way too subjective for us to know any of it honestly. Just the people in the room who can ask "why didn't this specific happen?"You think ..... you don’t know for 100% sure ... like I’m not saying they weren’t open .. but from what I can recollect there weren’t many plays this year off the top of my head where dudes were running wide open .. goff had to fit some throws into tights windows ..
Edit : and on those plays were they wide open maybe goff was getting hit in the face or had a defender in his throwing lane or getting sacked
If you looked at each play of the Seattle first half like I did, you would see that Goff did his best on each one of his passes except for maybe 5 passes at best. And even then, they weren't horrible decisions except for the pass that shall forevermore be nameless. And that was one of his worst games (Miami Jets and SF being the others).Well that can be said for every team in the NFL. I think our guys struggled more than before (no number 1 reciever) but I think Coop and Bobby are open enough that our offense shouldn't have been so putried.
Like the one where Blythe was not blocking anyone for a half second and then went to help out Edwards and HE got pushed by Edwards defender into Goff. Right when Goff threw the ball as well that would have gone to a WIDE open Woods in the Seattle game for a TD.You think ..... you don’t know for 100% sure ... like I’m not saying they weren’t open .. but from what I can recollect there weren’t many plays this year off the top of my head where dudes were running wide open .. goff had to fit some throws into tights windows ..
Edit : and on those plays were they wide open maybe goff was getting hit in the face or had a defender in his throwing lane or getting sacked
I haven’t been the biggest Goff supporter but his contract is hard to maneuver around. So I say let’s bring in Kaepernick. It’s a low cost option he’s been to a Super Bowl and he will definitely push Goff. At the end of the day either Goff rise to the challenge or McVay can really massage his ego by resurrecting Kaep
Yes baking is a science.Also depends on if it's cooking or baking.
Cooking is art. I tend to not use recipes when I cook. Lil extra here, maybe sub out an ingredient there...
Baking is science. You better measure that stuff... Baking is stoichiometry with heat. Off by a little bit can drastically change the output.
Kaepernick lost his job to Blaine Gabbert.I haven’t been the biggest Goff supporter but his contract is hard to maneuver around. So I say let’s bring in Kaepernick. It’s a low cost option he’s been to a Super Bowl and he will definitely push Goff. At the end of the day either Goff rise to the challenge or McVay can really massage his ego by resurrecting Kaep