31st ranked Oline in the league and to start the season Kroner and McVay were fine going into the season with them. Let that sink in. They were good with that Oline and it turned out like shit. It would have been even worse if it was Goff's knee that got crunched by Allen, or Demby. I don't understand how anyone can trust Kromer 's evaluation after that. Did you see how bad some of them played? And the top back up was Demby. Do you think Kroner went into last season saying, " This Offensive line is going to be bad. " ? He thought they'd be good.
I'm not prepared to give up on Kromer just yet.
I was as unhappy as anyone with the o-line play last year, but I just think we have to be careful in assuming we fully understand what happened within the organization to contribute to that result.
Not clear to me that Kromer assured McVay that the line would be good, much less be good under any or all adverse circumstances. He was very careful in choosing his words when assessing them at the beginning of the year. I don't remember hearing any grand promises. Kromer knew and pretty much stated that the lineup at the start of the season was a work in progress which needed time to gell.
They didn't get it. The Rams instead had a lot of injuries--- Noteboom, Allen, Havenstein, etc.-- that really compromised the line play last year. When you include the loss of loss of Saffold and Sullivan with the injury to Havenstein, they lost three starters. Not a great situation for any coach.
Also not clear that Kromer wasn't asking for reinforcements. The Rams elected to sign Fowler instead of Saffold-- I doubt Kromer advocated that. My take is that McVay gave Phillips and the D priority. Is that Kromer's fault? Snead and McVay set the FA and draft priorities, not the o line coach. They finally got Corbett, but it was pretty late in the day for help last year.
The Rams also didn't use their top picks on the line last year. The mid round guys they did get, Evans and Edwards, both showed some promise when thrown into the breach. They appear to be solid draft picks and there is a chance that they play well this year. However, starting them over more experienced players, until there was no choice, would probably have been roundly denounced as a poor decision.
I think we need to look at last year at least in part as an organizational failure for which McVay shares responsibility because he controls the allocation of resources. Kromer can be blamed for his coaching choices but I don't see where he had any silver bullets to avoid injuries or improve the roster. And those imo were the main problems.
Let's see what Kromer does this year. (We have no choice anyway.) If the o-line is terrible again you can remind us all you were right.