Jjab presented the case that the Rams front office is trying to promote the departure of Rah because they want to move on not because he is worthy and you are saying that Jjab just wants him gone because he is not in support of Rah is your argument and quite possibly true
"The Rams don't even want him that's why they are vocally supporting him"
It reminded me of a Motte Baily esque logical fallacy You were obviously the role of respondent
EX:
Arguer: I think we should legalize euthanasia for newborns if parents decide they can’t handle the responsibility of raising a child.
Respondent: By definition, that would be murder.
Arguer: I’m only trying to protect parents’ freedom and prevent children from being raised under neglectful or impoverished conditions. You don’t want children growing up in poverty, do you?
Ah. I appreciate that and see what you're saying.
My intent wasn't to have a debate, I was pointing out what I observed happening.
I guess the more direct response would be something like?
"The Rams aren't ready to move on, it's just good form to promote your personnel and receiving the draft picks would be a boon. It's a win-win approach, because if he stays, you've showed him you support him."
The device in the first statement that I think disqualifies it from this model is the, "Can we be honest?"
That takes it from being an opinion to something that's presented as a fact that some are just not acknowledging.
