Stafford and those 2 first-rounders - worth it?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,667
Name
Kupped
Yeah.. if you think culture and identity are important for winning in football.. and I do.. you should probably be a little worried about the Rams chances to get to the next level.
 

badnews

Use Your Illusion
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
5,364
Name
Dave
Ask me again after our playoff game.
If he's not better than he has been over the second half of the season in his next game, that's going to be a negative...
 
Last edited:

madrid311

RomandeacondickersonolsenwarnerStafforddonaldkupp
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
501
Name
Madrid311
There are no more levels. One and done.
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,667
Name
Kupped
Stafford was excellent yesterday.

He's not the reason the Rams lost yesterday.

But

Do people really think it's out of line to be disappointed in him and to expect more out of the overtime possession?
 

MarkyMark

Rams fan for Life!!
Joined
Aug 7, 2018
Messages
248
Name
Mark
Stafford is worth it. I honestly believe next year he'll be much better...... Just my opinion. Let's just beat up on the Cards this weekend, and we'll go from there.
 

rdlkgliders

"AKA" Hugo Bezdek
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
8,235
Name
Don
This will never be answered with unanimous or even dramatic majority support. This years team is better than last years team and in the end that is always a plus
 

AZRams

What, we're all thinking it...
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
3,473
The OL is bad and that is the problem more than anything.
Not statistically, they were one of the highest-rated OLs in the league during the regular season. They've gotten banged around in individual match-ups.

We'll never know if we could have gotten back to a SB with OL changes and the same QB.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,671
Stafford is actually in a good place right now. He's not a QB who is going to dominate if the pass pro is shit. The guys who can are the rare dudes like Elway, Rodgers, Mahomes and even those guys will have bad games when the protections are bad. He's not Rodgers. But again that's ok.

We have to protect him. That game had some of the shittiest pass pro I can recall seeing from our OL. We were up early because of him. We were in that game because of him. So all the whining about how he played in this game I find to be kind of funny, it tells me some of you guys still have a lot to learn about foozball.

Nothing has changed. He has two playoffs to prove he can do this. First playoffs starts now. So settle down and try to enjoy it you fucking ninnies.
 

raised_fisT

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
3,502
Stafford led the league in interceptions this year.
Well, tied with the rookie on the worst team in the league, Trevor Lawrence. That's not OK.
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,841
Stafford led the league in interceptions this year.
Well, tied with the rookie on the worst team in the league, Trevor Lawrence. That's not OK.


When you're second in TD passes, 6th in passer rating and 4th in QBR. I don't care nearly as much about how many INTs were thrown.
Oh and when you're tied for the third best record in the NFL.
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,841
Very easily yes.

Defensive regression plus no Cam Akers/worse run game plus losing Robert Woods and we still finished a game better than last year. And our division was better overall but still went 3-3.

And Kupp went from "not explosive" to having one of the best years of all time.

Also, we went 10-0 against teams that missed the playoffs.

Last year we lost four games to non playoff teams, going 7-4.
 

KA210927

Rookie
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
377
Name
Kevin
Stafford had about 4900 yards and 41 TD. Goffs best year was 2018 with 4600 yards and 32 TD.

Even with the Rams losing Woods (arguable #1 receiver last few years) and Akers (#1 RB) the offense has been very good. I saw many argue Woods was more important to the team than Kupp before this year. Woods also was generally drafted over Kupp in fantasy football (if it matters).

What teams lose their top WR and top RB and still have success on offense? Not many.

I think people don’t realize how lucky we are to have gotten Stafford this year. I think the Rams 100% miss the playoffs this year if Goff was leading this offense.

I’ll take Stafford all day over Goff who has clearly gone backwards since 2018.

Also this was Stafford best statistical season ever. Think about that and then think with Woods/Akers/Maybe an offseason with OBJ to learn the offense... he should only improve next year. His talent is top 5 in the league and we saw that often this year.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,671
Very easily yes.

Defensive regression plus no Cam Akers/worse run game plus losing Robert Woods and we still finished a game better than last year. And our division was better overall but still went 3-3.

And Kupp went from "not explosive" to having one of the best years of all time.

Also, we went 10-0 against teams that missed the playoffs.

Last year we lost four games to non playoff teams, going 7-4.
This year's team is better than last year's team in many ways. I'd say it's a clearly better team overall. And I also think this year's playoffs are stacked in the NFC. So we're not the only really good team.

In the end it's all about survival. So as excruciating as it was to lose that final game fact remains our team is entering the playoffs playing some of their best ball. We ended up losing in the trenches on both sides of the ball to SF but still played them to OT. If we get a third game vs those fucks maybe we beat them finally.

But either way everyone's 0-0 now. Who's gonna be the last team standing, well why not us.
 

NEOM

UDFA
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Messages
23
Name
MbS
Again, there is no debate that Stafford is an upgrade to Goff. If someone argues against it, just stop. The main point is will he be able to compete against the likes of Rodgers or Brady, when the time is up. I understand that you need all players to click at the right moment, but there will be scenario’s where Stafford need to make a play under massiv pressure and then we will see whether the trade was successful or not.
 

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,007
When you're second in TD passes, 6th in passer rating and 4th in QBR. I don't care nearly as much about how many INTs were thrown.
Oh and when you're tied for the third best record in the NFL.
I wouldn't mind the interceptions if they were pressure interceptions.

I mind the pick 6 interceptions inside the 20 and the long interceptions when a guy is covered by 3 guys.

Those are the ones that he needs to stop.

I didn't even mind the interception to end the game because it was one on one. I was just confused that he under threw it that badly.

Not sure what is going on with his under throws.
 

iamme33

Pro Bowler
Joined
Dec 24, 2013
Messages
1,204
Name
dan
Nope. Give me those two picks back and use them to bolster the running game.

yeah it not just the two picks its all high round picks snead has traded away. if we had all those high picks going way back we not only could more than likely have a far better ol but also inside lb and a lot sounder df back field. but can't cry over spilt milk all we can do is root for us to put it all together and win the bowl.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.