I keep seeing this as generally accepted knowledge and I’ve seen mentions to the rams investing in their data analytics but never saying they are much further along than the rest of the NFL. Do you have any sources ?Yeah, everyone uses analytics, but some are MUCH farther along than others.
The Rams are at the vanguard in this respect.
Well, if Eskridge tries to play with physicality and violence at the NFL level, his 185lb ass is likely to be mince meat. Bring it sister.Both are very, very fast. Eskridge is 5'8" 185 and a former defensive player. He plays the game the physicality and violence you expect of a defensive guy now playing offense. Tutu might have a small edge in terms of speed, but Eskridge is extremely fast himself. Both are very quick. Eskridge is the more polished route runner at this stage imo. Eskridge catches the ball and plays through contact better. Eskridge was also an elite returnman in college. Frankly, the biggest differences for me are the weight (both are 5'8", but Eskridge is 30+ pounds heavier) and Eskridge being much more physical.
We'll never know for sure how we had the "speedy" WRs ranked. But one thing we know for sure is McVay loved Atwell pre draft. Peter Shraeger, the NFL network insider is arguably the closest media member to McVay. They have a personal relationship that goes back to when McVay was an assistant coach back in Washington. Shraeger and McVay used to go get drunk at the combine & senior bowl and talk about players. Shraeger said McVay told him pre-draft to watch out for Tutu Atwell in LA. That he loved his game and the way he tracked the ball down the field reminded him of DeSean Jackson Jr.I am not saying you are wrong but that the Rams preferred Atwell.
a) as much as Isaac Bruce and Torry Holt had miles of YAC, they also frustrated defenders by getting down or running out of bounds to avoid the big hit... and this was during that fucked up "Jacked UP" time. "Live for another down" was a mantra... even as Martz was leaving Warner to get hammered.
b) also, Tutu is 160 and should only be gaining weight prior to the season. All this stuff about 155 or lower is in the past. As of now he's up to 160 and I would be surprised if he's less than 165 at the start of pre-season.
3) We KNOW that teams valued their 2022 draft picks SO HIGHLY that almost none were traded. The 2021 draft class had over 600 players in it, down nearly 2/3rds over normal years and with the super senior COVID compensation, in 2022 there will be over 2200 players in that draft... which essentially turns the draft into giant 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rounds with a partial 4th. That means that the Rams EASILY could have traded up using 2022 draft picks if they were so inclined. EVERYONE who had 2022 picks had ammo. Not saying a 2022 6th rounder would get you a 1st in 2021, but a 2nd next year would EASILY get you a 2nd this year.
We don't know who the trade up would have been for and it's moot now, but yeah... much like manipulating the cap, the current draft circumstances made moving up this year a much easier task than in normal years ESPECIALLY if a team were inclined to use 2022 picks (almost none were).
Well, if Eskridge tries to play with physicality and violence at the NFL level, his 185lb ass is likely to be mince meat. Bring it sister.
Here's hoping that Atwell can use his speed to take away angles and big hits and that he has a long and healthy career as a Ram.
Moderator says not to continue with thisabsolutely not true.
1) indicates their intent.
2) indicates intel which guided their decision. They didn't just fear it, they had intel that a specific team wanted him. Whether that intel was ultimately true isn't the point. That intel was a factor in deciding to not trade down.
3) We KNOW that teams valued their 2022 draft picks SO HIGHLY that almost none were traded. The 2021 draft class had over 600 players in it, down nearly 2/3rds over normal years and with the super senior COVID compensation, in 2022 there will be over 2200 players in that draft... which essentially turns the draft into giant 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rounds with a partial 4th. That means that the Rams EASILY could have traded up using 2022 draft picks if they were so inclined. EVERYONE who had 2022 picks had ammo. Not saying a 2022 6th rounder would get you a 1st in 2021, but a 2nd next year would EASILY get you a 2nd this year.
We don't know who the trade up would have been for and it's moot now, but yeah... much like manipulating the cap, the current draft circumstances made moving up this year a much easier task than in normal years ESPECIALLY if a team were inclined to use 2022 picks (almost none were).
Read the thread. The Moderator already stated not to continue with this matter.That's a terrible metric to base an opinion on.
There are umpteen reasons why a team might use the entire time.
I keep seeing this as generally accepted knowledge and I’ve seen mentions to the rams investing in their data analytics but never saying they are much further along than the rest of the NFL. Do you have any sources ?
It was in a previous thread not related to this thread. The Rams were the first to use a certain analytics company and they used them extensively due to their multi-facited information. Other teams are now starting to use them but the Rams lean more heavily on modern information and play time data.I keep seeing this as generally accepted knowledge and I’ve seen mentions to the rams investing in their data analytics but never saying they are much further along than the rest of the NFL. Do you have any sources ?
Knock off the passive aggressive bullshit. If you need clarity on this, feel free to PM a moderator.Moderator says not to continue with this
Read the thread. The Moderator already stated not to continue with this matter.
I blame the mods for everything too. Those bastids.Read the thread. The Moderator already stated not to continue with this matter.
I keep seeing this as generally accepted knowledge and I’ve seen mentions to the rams investing in their data analytics but never jsaying they are much further along than the rest of the NFL. Do you have any sources ?
The guy has a ton of size questions without a doubt. But beyond that to call him a gadget player baffles me. He is almost unstoppable when he gets a free release. In fact I wonder what he would have done with a really good QB throwing to him.I may be wrong but I see a bunch of failed gadget plays with only a few successful ones regarding Atwell.
McVay may see Atwell as Tyreek Hill, I see him as Hill’s underdeveloped little brother.
My only worry is that McVay early in the season will really light a few teams up and all the quick scores will put the D on the field a LOT.
One of the side effects of tightening up the O that I liked (maybe the only thing) was that it chewed up clock and didn't let other explosive teams get into a rhythm.
That said, there's a peace in knowing you can score from anywhere. The 2018 team was like that and the GSOT teams were def like that.
No uKnock off the passive aggressive bullshit. If you need clarity on this, feel free to PM a moderator.
I didn’t get a chance to see that one. And I’m not doubting the rams heavily utilize these things just find it mind boggling that other multi billion dollar organizations aren’t doing the sameIt was in a previous thread not related to this thread. The Rams were the first to use a certain analytics company and they used them extensively due to their multi-facited information. Other teams are now starting to use them but the Rams lean more heavily on modern information and play time data.