- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 35,226
- Name
- Stu
Fair enough but I simply disagree. I know many in the military and former military and not one of them agrees with the idea. (I have to qualify that I guess. I have met Mac so there is one that I know) This is anecdotal I am aware. But the idea that it hasn’t hurt the product at least in the short run is IMO intentionally ignoring what has taken place.Does it really harm the product though? Reports are that viewership was down, but it's getting impossible to tell with all the streaming. On the flip side, "no press is bad press". The kneeling had outlets discussing the NFL that didn't normally.
As for the kneeling - I don't think I'll ever understand your view point. Aside from @Mackeyser whose post was brilliant, I've had other military people tell me it doesn't bother them. And even if it does bother some people, the irony is that things in life have bothered some people enough to the point where they feel like they have to kneel during the anthem. So it worked.
This country is all about freedom, and people can do whatever they want during the anthem IMO. And there are issues, and based on the conversations it's started, I think it was the right move.
Obviously nothing I say will change any of it but being that the players are in uniform when they do it, the owners and the league have every right to object or allow it as they have begrudgingly done. And while I disagree with them doing it, I do understand. I think that many of the players are being disengenuous but so is the NFL with their mock respect in having fly overs paid for by the taxpayers. I continued to watch football. But many I know have not - even some very diehard fans.