Stranger
How big is infinity?
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 7,182
- Name
- Hugh
Okay, I will "amend" stated rule, that "teams take-on personality of head coach", as follows:X said:The team always takes on the personality of its head coach? How's that? Baltimore has had a couple of head coaches in Ray Lewis' tenure and their defense remains the same. Pittsburgh has had a couple of head coaches, and they haven't changed. Tampa went from Dungy (nice guy) to Gruden (yeller) to Raheem Morris, and they haven't changed much. Indianapolis went from Dungy to Caldwell and their production or personality didn't alter.interference said:The team alway takes-on the personality of its head coach, and these repeated on-field mistakes are the sign of a pervailing attitude that it's okay to fail. This is basically what Orlando said in his interview this week, which I posted here, and I am convinced that this is our more significant issue.X said:Bingo.Phantmjokr said:coaching influence is highly overrated and outside factors influence team success much much more.
A team need only lose one or two of their 'centerpieces', and things can go south in a hurry. Consecutive bad drafts can also leave you talent deficient a few years down the road. Multiple unfortunate incidents will make a team very uncompetitive. Knute Rockne couldn't muster a speech good enough to overcome some of those things.
Further, I don't think this coach will make the approprate changes within himself until he fails at this job. I saw the same with Dick Vermeil when he was the coach of the Eagles... it took 14 years away from coaching and a revolt by the Ram players for Vermeil finally to see the errors in his ways.
No, only way we are going to suceed is with another regime. And while I hate the prospect of starting over, I see this as the ONLY option now.
I was all for Jeff Fisher when we lost Linehan, and now I'd take either Fisher or Gruden in a heart beat. What we do at GM I don't know. But when I learned that this current regime pulled-down all of the GSOT memorabila, it was the final straw for me. In my 40 years of being a fan of the Rams, I've never been this pissed-off at management.
What about Vermeil and Martz? Same teams, same results (almost). I'd be more inclined to believe that teams take on the personality of their veteran leadership, if we're going to talk about personalities. As far as team identity, that's always a product of the system. Since 2008, this would now be the third (system).
I guess a bunch of us are just going to differ on this. Some would like to point a finger at one specific thing, and others are more inclined to itemize the list.
Teams take-on personality of head coach, unless there is a strong existing tradition of personality across the players, existing management, or ownership. In said exceptions, head coach may have limited influence on part or all of team.
In this situation, I'm not separating the coaching staff from management, as they (for the sake-of-my-argument) came into together and together developed the personality, or lack thereof, of the current franchise.
In summary, I guess I've alread shut-off. I've heard enough detailed explainations, listened to enough argument, and hence, I've reached the point of no-return. Perhaps I'm irrational, perhaps not. In short, I don't like what I've seen, and no further analysis is going to have an impact on me.
Time to bring the GSOT influence into the organization. The Rams nation has a huge inventory of players that know what it takes to be a professional and how to win. Let's get them involved and continue the great and proud traditions that they instilled in this franchise.