Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 23,347
Expectations...
But that is my point. You are not even giving him the first year. You are giving him 6 games (In which he hasn't played). Basically, what I am reading is that you think if a guy is drafted, and he isn't AT LEAST the first guy off the bench, immediately, he is a wasted draft pick. Sorry, I just completely disagree with that.
And yes, it is tough to get a read on. You generally can't judge a draft for 3 years, right? No matter how much YOU want instant results, it is TOO EARLY to judge a guy after 6 games. Period. You wanting results faster doesn't change that.
(EDIT) P.S. I am assuming, based on your standard, that you ABSOLUTELY HATED Goff at this point in his career. Six games in and The #1 Overall Pick in the draft couldn't even get on the field. And, he looked bad in the pre-season. I can't imagine how big of a bust you must have thought he was.
Nope. I was all for picking Goff. You are comparing a QB to an Olineman. Unless the QB is Russell Wilson making plays off the cuff you can't do that. QB is the most difficult position to play in sports.
I said many times through the years that picking a project t before round 4 is a wasted pick. In the first three rounds you look for instant contributors. Not necessarily stars, but someone who can do something that helps the team. Ron Bartell is a good example. He struggled early on and by the time he finally was getting good, his contract was coming up. So if that player evolves thanks to your coaching and then leaves, you got very little return on investment. If he never produces then it was a total waste. You'd be better off trading the pick for a proven NFL player.
The average NFL career is three years. In four years a rookie contract is up. So when using a top three pick its important to pick a player that is capable of contributing in some capacity in year one and starting by year two or in a rotation. Evans looks like a long shot. If Snead and Kromer had a better track record picking Olinemen, then I might be a bit more patient. I also agree that you need to give a draft class three years to truly evaluate it, but you can also give instant evaluation on what you know from watching college games on individual picks. You can watch pre-season games and get a feel for a guys potential to help the team, i.e. Natres Patrick. Pre-season games are mostly played against backups. So it's not like these players are being dominated by Starters.
You can like Evans all you want. It doesn't bother me. I don't know why it bothers you that I don't. But the state of the OLine should be a concern to any fan right now. First we hear that Eldrenkamp is the center of the future, then it's Allen, now a third round pick can't even beat out Demby as a backup. Demby is the lowest rated Olinemen on PFF by a long shot. Nobody is near him, but you don't need to read ratings to know that. If he's the best backup they have then this offense is in a lot of trouble. It's already suffering from Allen's poor play, which I also predicted last year, because I watched him for four years in college. You can hang onto hope all you want. I did that from 2006 to 2016. I just call em' like I see em' now.