Hate to break it to you Chief, but every team has cut or traded an overpriced vet player. That is the reality of the league.Good player, good person, good leader. He will be missed. It feels like he has been around forever, but he is only 30 years old, and a very late birthday to boot (December 21st). He was extremely versatile too, capable of playing multiple positions, which is always one my most valued qualities in an offensive or defensive lineman given how important the trenches are and how many injuries occur at those positions. He had a huge resurgence under Staley last year, as well. To me, that showed in the right system, he still had a few very productive years left.
We probably cut bait at the right time. His best years will likely be behind him sooner rather than later. And I understand why we did it - we need to clear cap space, and we have some depth there. But losing Brock for what seems likely to be almost nothing is what bothers me. His contract wasn't egregious. I think he is a player that still has tangible value. But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross. Let this be further evidence that the huge contracts blowing up in our face need to STOP. If they don't someone needs to be shown the door. Austin, Ogletree, Goff, Gurley, Cooks. Some of those made sense. Others less so. Some were spoiled by poor luck with injuries. But it can't go on like this without consequence.
Will miss you Brock. Now go get Golladay, Fuller or Hudson.
They normally like talking about trading Kupp along with that...No.Why do people want to spend big money on a WR? We're already paying Kupp and Woods.
So they can complain later that we havent invested properly in the o-line, or the linebackers, or that we shouldnt have let Johnson go.....Why do people want to spend big money on a WR? We're already paying Kupp and Woods.
Sometimes complaints are valid. Being weak at center has been a problem for a couple of seasons and we have a right to complain as to how little the Rams seem to care about that...So they can complain later that we havent invested properly in the o-line, or the linebackers, or that we shouldnt have let Johnson go.....
There are plenty of people around the league that think the Rams are showing people how to get it done.Good player, good person, good leader. He will be missed. It feels like he has been around forever, but he is only 30 years old, and a very late birthday to boot (December 21st). He was extremely versatile too, capable of playing multiple positions, which is always one my most valued qualities in an offensive or defensive lineman given how important the trenches are and how many injuries occur at those positions. He had a huge resurgence under Staley last year, as well. To me, that showed in the right system, he still had a few very productive years left.
We probably cut bait at the right time. His best years will likely be behind him sooner rather than later. And I understand why we did it - we need to clear cap space, and we have some depth there. But losing Brock for what seems likely to be almost nothing is what bothers me. His contract wasn't egregious. I think he is a player that still has tangible value. But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross. Let this be further evidence that the huge contracts blowing up in our face need to STOP. If they don't someone needs to be shown the door. Austin, Ogletree, Goff, Gurley, Cooks. Some of those made sense. Others less so. Some were spoiled by poor luck with injuries. But it can't go on like this without consequence.
Yep, but you cant look to add a 3rd WR making 16-20 mill and complain about not making improvements elsewhereSometimes complaints are valid. Being weak at center has been a problem for a couple of seasons and we have a right to complain as to how little the Rams seem to care about that...
Agreed. I am not one calling for an expensive FA wideout...Yep, but you cant look to add a 3rd WR making 16-20 mill and complain about not making improvements elsewhere
Would like to see how the negotiations went but that will never happen.
I see the tweet saying the Rams asked him to adjust not take a pay cut. Not being able to get that done does not sound like “we not me”.
If that’s the case, C-ya have fun in that wasteland.
But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross