Brockers traded to Detroit.

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,548
Detroit obviously thinks highly of Brockers. They cut Danny Shelton and saved 4 mil after 1.25 mil dead money hit. Now they're paying Brockers 6.5 mil this year (and 7.5 mil for next year if they keep him).
 

OntarioRam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
3,983
Good player, good person, good leader. He will be missed. It feels like he has been around forever, but he is only 30 years old, and a very late birthday to boot (December 21st). He was extremely versatile too, capable of playing multiple positions, which is always one my most valued qualities in an offensive or defensive lineman given how important the trenches are and how many injuries occur at those positions. He had a huge resurgence under Staley last year, as well. To me, that showed in the right system, he still had a few very productive years left.

We probably cut bait at the right time. His best years will likely be behind him sooner rather than later. And I understand why we did it - we need to clear cap space, and we have some depth there. But losing Brock for what seems likely to be almost nothing is what bothers me. His contract wasn't egregious. I think he is a player that still has tangible value. But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross. Let this be further evidence that the huge contracts blowing up in our face need to STOP. If they don't someone needs to be shown the door. Austin, Ogletree, Goff, Gurley, Cooks. Some of those made sense. Others less so. Some were spoiled by poor luck with injuries. But it can't go on like this without consequence.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,693
I hate it, but it is what it is. I think Detroit takes the full freight here, his roster bonus hits tomorrow. If I'm reading correctly, there's no dead money so it should be saving 8 mill
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,454
Name
Scott
Good player, good person, good leader. He will be missed. It feels like he has been around forever, but he is only 30 years old, and a very late birthday to boot (December 21st). He was extremely versatile too, capable of playing multiple positions, which is always one my most valued qualities in an offensive or defensive lineman given how important the trenches are and how many injuries occur at those positions. He had a huge resurgence under Staley last year, as well. To me, that showed in the right system, he still had a few very productive years left.

We probably cut bait at the right time. His best years will likely be behind him sooner rather than later. And I understand why we did it - we need to clear cap space, and we have some depth there. But losing Brock for what seems likely to be almost nothing is what bothers me. His contract wasn't egregious. I think he is a player that still has tangible value. But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross. Let this be further evidence that the huge contracts blowing up in our face need to STOP. If they don't someone needs to be shown the door. Austin, Ogletree, Goff, Gurley, Cooks. Some of those made sense. Others less so. Some were spoiled by poor luck with injuries. But it can't go on like this without consequence.
Hate to break it to you Chief, but every team has cut or traded an overpriced vet player. That is the reality of the league.
 
Last edited:

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,725
Name
Jemma
Good luck to Brockers. He’s always been one of my favorites.
 

12intheBox

Legend
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
10,315
Name
Wil Fay
I’m not expecting much in terms of compensation. 7th that could turn into a 6th kind of thing.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,693
Why do people want to spend big money on a WR? We're already paying Kupp and Woods.
So they can complain later that we havent invested properly in the o-line, or the linebackers, or that we shouldnt have let Johnson go.....
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,344
Name
Tim
Would like to see how the negotiations went but that will never happen.

I see the tweet saying the Rams asked him to adjust not take a pay cut. Not being able to get that done does not sound like “we not me”.

If that’s the case, C-ya have fun in that wasteland.
 

TheBunk

Rookie
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
331
I wish we were in cahoots with a more talented team for these transactions, but maybe trading ponies with Holmes will be of greater benefit down the road.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,163
So they can complain later that we havent invested properly in the o-line, or the linebackers, or that we shouldnt have let Johnson go.....
Sometimes complaints are valid. Being weak at center has been a problem for a couple of seasons and we have a right to complain as to how little the Rams seem to care about that...
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,344
Name
Tim
Good player, good person, good leader. He will be missed. It feels like he has been around forever, but he is only 30 years old, and a very late birthday to boot (December 21st). He was extremely versatile too, capable of playing multiple positions, which is always one my most valued qualities in an offensive or defensive lineman given how important the trenches are and how many injuries occur at those positions. He had a huge resurgence under Staley last year, as well. To me, that showed in the right system, he still had a few very productive years left.

We probably cut bait at the right time. His best years will likely be behind him sooner rather than later. And I understand why we did it - we need to clear cap space, and we have some depth there. But losing Brock for what seems likely to be almost nothing is what bothers me. His contract wasn't egregious. I think he is a player that still has tangible value. But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross. Let this be further evidence that the huge contracts blowing up in our face need to STOP. If they don't someone needs to be shown the door. Austin, Ogletree, Goff, Gurley, Cooks. Some of those made sense. Others less so. Some were spoiled by poor luck with injuries. But it can't go on like this without consequence.
There are plenty of people around the league that think the Rams are showing people how to get it done.

I’ll take how things have been run over the last 5 years anytime over the shit show that Georgia ran.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,693
Sometimes complaints are valid. Being weak at center has been a problem for a couple of seasons and we have a right to complain as to how little the Rams seem to care about that...
Yep, but you cant look to add a 3rd WR making 16-20 mill and complain about not making improvements elsewhere
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,163
Yep, but you cant look to add a 3rd WR making 16-20 mill and complain about not making improvements elsewhere
Agreed. I am not one calling for an expensive FA wideout...
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,377
Would like to see how the negotiations went but that will never happen.

I see the tweet saying the Rams asked him to adjust not take a pay cut. Not being able to get that done does not sound like “we not me”.

If that’s the case, C-ya have fun in that wasteland.

If it were just moving money around, he'd still be here. They had to have asked him to take a pay cut.
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,371
Name
Haole
Big Brock has been a rock for us for a long time. We got more than our money's worth from him. Especially this last year when he had failed his physical trying to sign with the crows. I wonder if our decision makers think he has a higher risk for injury now that he's getting up there in years of playing in the trenches of the NFL.

Hopefully he can last a bit longer for that team in the Dirty D... but that turf in that shit hole has taken out a multitude of players.
 

Liberator

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
1,438
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #99
But because of the Rams' poor cap management, this is the position we are in, dealing a useful player for pennies on the dollar, and the contract we are shedding is hardly an albatross

I like how you made this bold because you know most people aren't gonna read your post but still want people to see the part that will piss them off. Top tier stuff.
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,390
Interesting situation. The Rams welcomed Brockers back after he almost left to go to Baltimore. Now, a year later, it sounds like he was the lone holdout among a group of veterans asked to help out by restructuring.

I’ve always been a fan of Brockers, but from a loyalty/“we not me” standpoint, I don’t think he holds the high ground.

I wish him well, and hope we put the savings to good use.