Which QB should the Rams draft in the 1st Round next year?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I'm kind of curious as to why Haynes King doesnt get much hype. Kid's got serious wheels, decent arm strength and good size. Not saying he's a 1st rounder but that team is nothing without him
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
As much as I like kyren, if Love is on the board when the Rams pick, they'd be fools not to take him. Kind of like when the Rams drafted Gurley. Yikes
I concur but Kyren’s blocking especially blitz pickup is next level and too often overlooked. That two headed monster would be amazing! With our TEs and WRs together with Stafford, and an emphasis on the run game, we could look like Brady’s Patriots who were pretty much unstoppable. That system also benefitted Brady whose career was extended by rarely ever getting hit
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien
I don’t see it personally but could Mendoza fall in range of the our first pick because teams fall in love with one or two QBs ahead of him? It can depend on the system (think the Cardinals then head coach and amulet Murray). For me, at least, Mendoza looks like a fantastic fit for McVay and what we do. Perhaps he can be better than Goff who is woefully underrated as a QB in this league - a perception that will only change if he wins a SB with the Lions. Sound familiar?

One thing for certain, the Rams love a player who transfered to prove their worth against better competition. Mendoza has done that and has the kind of arm talent, moxy and functional athleticism that McVay desires

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien
Is Klubnic a dark horse for our offense? He has vastly underperformed vs preseason expectations. He probably does not have time to turn his season completely around - so will probably be available later than where we pick. He’s supposed to be whip smart, dedicated to watching film, has more experience than most prospects and clearly has talent

AI driven analysis:

Klubnik's performance has significantly improved. According to Sports Illustrated, his efficiency metrics (Total QBR, completion percentage, and yards per completion) have seen a dramatic increase in the four games since his injury compared to his first four games of the season.

Follow the link above:

“Where Clemson's Cade Klubnik Landed in Updated ESPN QB Rankings​

ESPN’s latest QB rankings highlight a dramatic rebound from Clemson’s veteran quarterback after a brutal start to the season”

See also:


One thing I always look for is whether a top player has played through an injury that has impacted their performance? That is true here:


Should we be talking about him more? I think so. I guarantee that with his experience and pedigree that he will outplay QBs taken higher in the draft
 
Last edited:
How about both :-)
cushion GIF
 
I have to watch Ty Simpson more, but against Oklahoma yesterday, it appeared, he had trouble anticipating the rush, which IMO, is the reason, he fumbles so much. That one play from the right side, howe did he not see that coming? Now, I need to see more, but against the Sooners yesterday was not Ty Simpson's finest hour.
 
I liked his film coming out. So I get why Morris drafted him. But this recent interview and his comments are a bad indicator for him because I doubt Morris would leave his young QB all alone. Just doesn't wash given what I think of Morris. Which means you may be right about him not being a leader but time will tell.
I don’t see Morris doing it either.
If Penix feels alone, it’s more than likely because he alienates those around him.
 
  • Like
  • Cheers
Reactions: Merlin and Memento
Don't draft a QB intending to fix his throwing motion. That is one of those things that almost never is fixable by the time a guy makes the NFL. Draft him if you think you can win with that throwing motion.
Muscle memory is extremely difficult to fix, unless it’s something minor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
Yes, if the Burrow option does actually arise, it must be done.
Not sure about this. Why would we pay a QB who has been injured over 30% of his career to this point. He ain't gonna get more durable as he gets older, although I think we could protect him better than the Bungles. I just hes too brittle, could be wrong though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BC Ramfan
Not sure about this. Why would we pay a QB who has been injured over 30% of his career to this point. He ain't gonna get more durable as he gets older, although I think we could protect him better than the Bungles. I just hes too brittle, could be wrong though.

Not buying the brittle stuff. Still an elite QB, top 5 when healthy, who is a threat to win the Super Bowl every year, especially if he was on our team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
Not sure about this. Why would we pay a QB who has been injured over 30% of his career to this point. He ain't gonna get more durable as he gets older, although I think we could protect him better than the Bungles. I just hes too brittle, could be wrong though.
Bengals are not trading Joe Burrow, he is there franchise. Durability somewhat of an issue, but the Bengals cannot fix the OL that has been a project for them lasting longer than the Big Dig. Mike Brown is not a great owner, but his daughter, Katie Blackburn has taken over for the most part and I don't see her allowing a trade for Burrow, who is from Ohio and currently the Bengals meal ticket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
Not sure about this. Why would we pay a QB who has been injured over 30% of his career to this point. He ain't gonna get more durable as he gets older, although I think we could protect him better than the Bungles. I just he's too brittle, could be wrong though.

I agree that durability is a factor to consider but I don't think of Burrow as 'brittle'.

Prior to this season, Burrow only missed 9 games in the prior four years (2021-2024) ... so he played in 87% of the Bengals' games for that period. By comparison, Stafford played fewer games (57) over that period.

From 2021-2024, Burrow was sacked 164X in 59 games. By comparison, Stafford was sacked 117X.

I don't think there's ANY CHANCE Cincinnati trades Burrow this off-season ... BUT ... I could see it in 2027.

Assuming the Bengals fail to make the playoffs this year (seems likely) that will be three straight seasons.
Should Cincinnati fail to be a playoff team in 2026 (Who Knows?) that would make Four Years in a row ... and Burrow would be 30 years old ... AND ... the cap ramifications to the Bengals would be far less severe.

Furthermore, even if Zac Taylor survives this season to coach in 2026, he may not be retained should Cincinnati not make the post-season for four-straight-years.

Under the above circumstances, I could absolutely see Joe Burrow requesting a trade ... and, the Bengals being open to making a deal that could jump-start their team. Finally, the Bengals' ownership would probably prefer to move Burrow out-of-the Conference.

I don't see this scenario as being that Far Fetched ... just one more non-playoff year in 2026.

1763308982815.webp
 
I don’t see it personally but could Mendoza fall in range of the our first pick because teams fall in love with one or two QBs ahead of him? It can depend on the system (think the Cardinals then head coach and amulet Murray). For me, at least, Mendoza looks like a fantastic fit for McVay and what we do. Perhaps he can be better than Goff who is woefully underrated as a QB in this league - a perception that will only change if he wins a SB with the Lions. Sound familiar?

One thing for certain, the Rams love a player who transfered to prove their worth against better competition. Mendoza has done that and has the kind of arm talent, moxy and functional athleticism that McVay desires

I would love Mendoza in this offense. Dude hasn't really faltered this season and is about to be on the big stage in the CFP. I'll be very interested in how he performs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
He’s now ranked 3rd amongst College QBs by CBS

Honestly, I hadn't heard of the guy they have at #1 - Joe Fagnano (unfortunate name IMO). Looking at his game log and the kid can ball apparently. 25/1 TD/INT ratio is absurd. Of course, he hasn't played against top notch competition, but I'll have to look into him as he is a Senior and has great size. It appears he has some rushing ability also.
 
I would love Mendoza in this offense. Dude hasn't really faltered this season and is about to be on the big stage in the CFP. I'll be very interested in how he performs.
I was on Mendoza early, great size, arm strength and even better from the neck up, plus can extend plays with his legs. IMO, he will be the first QB taken off the board.
 
I don’t see it personally but could Mendoza fall in range of the our first pick because teams fall in love with one or two QBs ahead of him? It can depend on the system (think the Cardinals then head coach and amulet Murray). For me, at least, Mendoza looks like a fantastic fit for McVay and what we do. Perhaps he can be better than Goff who is woefully underrated as a QB in this league - a perception that will only change if he wins a SB with the Lions. Sound familiar?
It would be nice but I don't think Mendoza has a snowball's chance in hell of sliding outside that top 3. He's got it all. I think he's the slam dunk top pick, unless he suffers an injury or takes a major nosedive in his game which seems unlikely.

I have to watch Ty Simpson more, but against Oklahoma yesterday, it appeared, he had trouble anticipating the rush, which IMO, is the reason, he fumbles so much. That one play from the right side, howe did he not see that coming? Now, I need to see more, but against the Sooners yesterday was not Ty Simpson's finest hour.
He took a hit yesterday in his stock, no doubt about it. His problem is that being on the small side and not having an elite arm means your film has to put you up there to go at the top. So he could still go in the top group I'd say if he finishes strong, but if not then McVay will have a shot at him.

And again I don't like QBs who are under 6'2". To take one of them they have to have something else about them. He throws with anticipation and sees and reads well, so I think that's enormously valuable. It puts him in the first round I think, but where in the first probably comes down to how he finishes the year and his pro day workout. If he throws with authority that's a big part of it for a smaller dude like him.
 
Is Klubnic a dark horse for our offense? He has vastly underperformed vs preseason expectations. He probably does not have time to turn his season completely around - so will probably be available later than where we pick. He’s supposed to be whip smart, dedicated to watching film, has more experience than most prospects and clearly has talent
My concern with Klubnik is his arm strength. His ball seems to float a lot, but outside of that I don't think he's been as terrible as some have said. Seems like a second tier type, maybe third tier if his arm strength is suspect. He can get it there on a deep out but seems to have zero room for error. The dudes with the power arms basically have a bigger window to make those challening throws because they can muscle them on a flatter trajectory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle