What does "all-in" mean this time?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Pupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
9,620
ROD Credit 2025
17,838
Name
Pupped
The first time around, the Rams threw EVERYTHING at getting the roster to critical mass to win a SB, including a massive amount of draft capital. They had to, they desperately needed difference-makers like Stafford, Ramsey and Miller. This time? They *have* difference-makers on the roster, imo.. in Stafford, Verse and Puka. Their biggest issues are obvious, Corner and overall Special Teams.

I would argue that the "all-in" this time should be more on the financial end.. targeting FAs, especially one prime Corner. I would also consider going after Rasheed Shaheed.. overpriced.. but a perfect fit for this team's needs.

Do not use draft capital in trades unless there's a ridiculous value to be had and they should be looking to bolster the roster's overall talent and depth with the draft and be looking at the longterm as much as the immediate. My plan going into the draft would be using one of the firsts, but trading back with the other with the goal of having at least 6 picks in the first 4 rounds. WR, CB, and OT being the top priorities.. but then S and ILB and Edge. If they draft as well as recent years.. wow.

They've put themselves in the position to push the 2026 roster over the top.. while not sacrificing the future of the team.

Two moves.. converting Davante Adams and releasing Darious Williams.. puts them up to 71 million in space. I assume AT LEAST 10 mil of that goes to a raise for Stafford.. but that leaves A TON of money for some immediate roster help. Both in high-end spots like the two I mentioned.. but also for bargain hunting for those vets who can come in and offer quality depth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CGI_Ram
I think you're right. They need less additions to be all in this time and they have the cap to do it without sacrificing picks. Hopefully all in means aggressively upgrading the entire secondary with capable vets and adding more fire power and depth on offense through the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pupped
Honestly?

We need to bring in four new and good corners (two from the draft, one free agent and resign McCreary or Durant); two wide receivers, one of which who can return kicks; one inside linebacker; a safety (draft, free agent or resign Curl); and I think we still need an upgrade at center.

This is all relatively reasonable, without any huge moves.

I do think we have 'too many' draft picks right now - we really only have room for five or six rookies tops, so I suspect we'll be trading up more than down in the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Badfinger
"All-in" may mean packaging picks to move up for a Tate, Tyson or Reese. It may mean packaging picks and players to get a Max Crosby. It may mean investing some FA $$ into a Shaheed or Pierce (my preference).
I can't wait to find out :sunglasses:
 
  • Like
Reactions: HitStick
Im really hoping for quality over quantity additions. THE 2022 fallout rebuild is long over.

I think our more conservative draftniks are going to squirm in their seat this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ram Ts