For all we know most of the article can be true or false. We cannot pick and choose what we want to believe because it suits our points. If you bring the article into play then the whole article is valid. So
@FrantikRam is correct on bringing up that point. The article is the article. This is football. Players get singled out, berated, yelled at, etc. Happens in a lot of sports. He gave Goff game balls as well he stuck up for him constantly throwing himself on the sword. He got the guy paid for Christ sakes. At some point Goff should have learned or worked at it til he got it maybe thrown himself on the sword occasionally. See mcvay can get Goff 150 million dollars but Goff cant do the same for Mcvay. What Goff can do is underperform and get him fired. All angles need to be looked at.
Sports is not the real world of jobs it is a different animal but if you want to use the boss analogy then hey at what point do I as the boss sing your praises to my bosses get you a raise and you make me look foolish. Then my job comes into question so it's either me or you. It's probably takes more balls to go to your bosses and admit I made a mistake. He defended him to the press, to the organisation, to critics, and was big enough to admit he may have been wrong.
All that said we need to wait.
I try to be impartial but sometimes "Goff sensitive or sensitive in general" people basically making it look like Goff was mistreated thats ridiculous and makes one swing to the other side to provide both p.o.v.'s It's like God damn politics. Can't we just be in the middle and wait for the results before passing judgement. Guess what if goff lights it up and mcvays blows it there's your answer. Other way around then there's your answer. Should they both excel preferable outcome then simply a change was needed. Patience is virtue.