Seems to me he bunched over 50% of his turnovers in 3 games...
It could be argued that those 3 games would have given the Rams homefield advantage in the playoffs..
Possibly even a first round bye (idk i
I'd have to look at everything all over again).
Sooo then the Rams escape the brutality of a 1st round division rivalry playoff game and don't enter the next round beat up, worn out, and without Kupp or AD operating at 33% max capacity.
While only three games, those three games very well may have been the among the 4 most impactful losses Goff has ever had. 1 being the SB.
I am NOT a Goff hater. Please don't get me wrong. I love and believe in Goff. Just look at my post history. I also want to remain as objective as possible because it would be a disservice otherwise.
Goff played very bad in stretches, he also played very okay in stretches. I consider his play in the postseason to be great considering the thumb and circumstances. We may not have won because of him in Seattle, but we didn't win in spite of him either. Do you see what i mean there? Its not like we simply rode the D in that game. We surely didn't lose because of him, or the oline, in GB either.
We are a slightly above average center and an impact guard away from the Goff of 2017-2018.
It is a lot to expect of a man to go into Greenbay with a broken thumb, no Kupp, no time to disect a defense, basically no AD....and beat the most talented QB to ever play when he is behind an elite Oline and has the best receiver in the league to throw to or create mismatches elsewhere with....oh....and this dude AR has all of that in what is basically McVays scheme with some holdover from the west coast offense before Lefleur.
The playoffs, as with all games, are about matchups and we drew a crap hand.
I realistically just think that the post season goes much differently if Goff plays Ryan Tannehill-esque ball in those 3 aforementioned games.