So it's time to get a RB, right?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Should we sign or trade for a RB?

  • Yes

    Votes: 73 71.6%
  • No

    Votes: 29 28.4%

  • Total voters
    102

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,784
I've been one of the earliest panic complainers that the Rams need to add a RB or 2 since the day Akers went down for the season before it ever began.

I have exaggerated my reasons why they need to add RB's before the last minute cuts.

I've been lambasted and told to cool your jets Florida_Ram, and told to wait a couple more/few weeks as McVay and Snead calmly sort this out.

This repetitive post of mine has gotten mocked several times but I'm not shy to run it back..


Rams RB's with NFL regular season carries...

Xavier Jones - NFL carries 0 (I will admit he flashed vs the Chargers with little space to run behind with the 2nd & 3rd string 0-lineman)

Raymond Calais - NFL carries 0 (More of a special teams RB and shows below avg strength to break tackles.)

Jake Funk - NFL carries 0 (rookie hype train might show more in the next 2 preseason games, but can't hang our hat on him)

Otis Anderson - NFL carries 0 (was never going to be counted on as a 2021 RB by committee - special teams is his forte)

McVay & Snead likely will have a handful of RB's on their radar to add prior to week 1.

I'm just not patient with with this process and I hope they add at least one before the preseason ends.

IF the current group of RB's behind Hendo looks more of the same when we play the Raiders and Broncos, I won't be surprised.

Just my opinion.

I know it doesn't resonate with many of the solid ROD members, but I'm not changing my mind based on weeks 2 and 3 of the preseason.




Know what you want and don't gamble on the last minute before week 1 of the regular season

3417e47b46563c0e531c923b58d97084.gif
I agree the Rams need to look hard at adding a power running back. I just don’t want them to panic and pick up someone just because tgeubsedd we available now. Put together a list of RBs that fit the need and fit financially. pursue any and all on that list either via waiver wire or low round trade.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,847
Broncos used 3rd round choice on Royce Freeman in 2018 and he's outperformed by UDFA rookie Phillp Lindsey.
In 2019 Lindsey maintains the starting role averaging 4.5 ypc while Freeman averages 3.8 ypc
In 2020 the Broncos bring in Melvin Gordon.
And this past draft they use a 2nd round choice on Javonte Williams after signing RB Mike Boone in free agency.

Is Royce Freeman really any good? Or are the Broncos clueless?

I read he hasn't been the same after he hurt his ankle IIRC 2018-2019. The Broncos just lost Boone for 4-6 weeks IIRC he was ahead of him in the depth chart. It looks like he is needed by the Broncos. The word is he has looked good in camp. I posted about Boone in one of these threads.

I don't know if he has overcome the ankle problem. Snead would have to do some research.
 
Last edited:

Florida_Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
2,622
I agree the Rams need to look hard at adding a power running back. I just don’t want them to panic and pick up someone just because tgeubsedd we available now. Put together a list of RBs that fit the need and fit financially. pursue any and all on that list either via waiver wire or low round trade.

Precisely my concern.

I don't want them to panic either or rush to sign a RB that doesn't fit their vision.

It's been mentioned by several posters on this forum that they lack a bigger/power RB.

They also lack a proven pass protecting RB that can give Stafford an extra second to survey the field as he goes through his progressions vs the better defensives in the league.

The Rams RB group leaves a lot to be desired as of today.

They may be fine and everything works out.

I just hope they the do something about it less than 5 days before the opener.



Be careful McSnead...


k12692618.jpg
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,847
The answer should be Snead needs to find a solid RB to add to the roster. He has to find one before he can sign him. He has to do his DD to make sure that he is healthy, the cost, and ready to join the Rams. Lots of suggestions but, I don't think it's an easy process to get it right.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,153
The answer should be Snead needs to find a solid RB to add to the roster. He has to find one before he can sign him. He has to do his DD to make sure that he is healthy, the cost, and ready to join the Rams. Lots of suggestions but, I don't think it's an easy process to get it right.
"Yes...yes Mr. Snead, I can be there by Wednesday." ~ Brian Leonard
 

oldnotdead

Legend
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
5,406
I don't see the need for panic. You are all thinking this way because they were running behind the 2nd and 3rd string OL guys. Geez, until they see them behind the first string OL they really won't know what they need or don't. Like I've been saying they could use a real FB not some TE who will simply get in front of a LB. They need a FB to force the D off the LOS or running lane in the secondary. The Rams should try coaching up a LB to be a lead blocker. Then give him some time on the jug machine to teach him how to catch. Someone who runs a 4.6 or 4.7, is at least 6' tall and around 230-250 lbs should be just fine. If you want to run a power run attack you need a FB.

I've been saying these guys are not tackle breakers and no one believed me. A good lead road grading blocker goes a long way in curing that problem. They can pickup a FA RB anytime, there is no rush. Anyone on that wire is there for a reason. If the Rams can transition a WR to a TE they can cross train a LB to play FB.

I don't get this someone's discard is a Ram diamond perspective. What makes anyone think that those guys on the wire are better than who they have. The Rams simply need to get through this season and they will draft a RB next year because IMO Aker's long term prognosis isn't good.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
I don't see the need for panic. You are all thinking this way because they were running behind the 2nd and 3rd string OL guys. Geez, until they see them behind the first string OL they really won't know what they need or don't. Like I've been saying they could use a real FB not some TE who will simply get in front of a LB. They need a FB to force the D off the LOS or running lane in the secondary. The Rams should try coaching up a LB to be a lead blocker. Then give him some time on the jug machine to teach him how to catch. Someone who runs a 4.6 or 4.7, is at least 6' tall and around 230-250 lbs should be just fine. If you want to run a power run attack you need a FB.

I've been saying these guys are not tackle breakers and no one believed me. A good lead road grading blocker goes a long way in curing that problem. They can pickup a FA RB anytime, there is no rush. Anyone on that wire is there for a reason. If the Rams can transition a WR to a TE they can cross train a LB to play FB.

I don't get this someone's discard is a Ram diamond perspective. What makes anyone think that those guys on the wire are better than who they have. The Rams simply need to get through this season and they will draft a RB next year because IMO Aker's long term prognosis isn't good.

Where were you when I was pounding the table for FB Ben Mason prior to the draft ? Other than the critics, it was pretty much all crickets around here.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,184
Just want to observe here that time is not running out. As we go forward from this moment in camp the number of RB options on the market will only INCREASE.

That's not to say I don't want a RB brought in now. But perspective is needed here. This is why the Rams are not in a hurry. They know the market of available talent is going to grow with cuts.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,356
Yes. We need a HB. There are a handful of teams that have a ton of talent at the position. I'd be on the phone trying to work out a late-round pick swap for a HB on the bubble. The Texans, Colts, Bears, Jets, and Patriots are all teams worth reaching out to. And if the Cowboys were willing to part with Tony Pollard, I'd throw them a fourth for him. I think that dude is going to be a really good player. (I'd also love for us to talk to the Jets about Lamical Perine. He's not a spectacular guy, but if he could be had cheap, he's a well-rounded back.)
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,356
Where were you when I was pounding the table for FB Ben Mason prior to the draft ? Other than the critics, it was pretty much all crickets around here.
McVay doesn't seem interested in using a FB in his offense.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,811
And if the Cowboys were willing to part with Tony Pollard

I doubt they'll let him go.

He was in tandem with Henderson on the same team during their college career wasn't he?

.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,609
Name
Burger man

5 veteran running backs who may be falling out of favor — and could be available to Rams​

The question of whether or not the Los Angeles Rams need to add a running back to replace Cam Akers has yet to really present itself as necessary through the first three weeks of training camp. While Darrell Henderson is entrenched as the starter and won’t appear in the preseason, nobody between Xavier Jones, Jake Funk, or Raymond Calais has stood out — positively or negatively — enough to make the running back “numbers” obvious.

Last season, Sean McVay opted to enter Week 1 with Henderson, Akers, Malcolm Brown, and Jones, eventually adding Calais as a return option.

Injuries through training camp and early in the season prompted the inclusion of Brown into the offensive gameplan on a regular basis and it wasn’t until December that we really saw the impact that a play of Akers’ caliber could have on McVay’s offense. If the Rams are forced to include Jones, Funk, or Calais into the offense as a player getting 20, 30, or 40+ snaps in a game, we don’t know that’s a job that any of them are capable of executing.

We don’t even know if starting for 17 games is a job that Henderson can execute.

LA didn’t have a corresponding running back transaction to the Akers injury and I find that to be misleading. Though McVay may be giving Jones and Funk an opportunity to become complements to the offense in earnest, he wasn’t so forthcoming with snaps when it came to the rookie seasons of Henderson and Akers — and they were day two picks.

It is insulting and incorrect to believe that the mental aspect of football doesn’t apply to running backs. The concept that “running backs don’t matter” relies heavily upon the premise that running backs are mindless drones who only need to be fast and powerful and to be able to identify a lane to hit at 25 MPH. But the NFL is littered with veteran running backs that defy this premise because they aren’t the biggest, the fastest, or the strongest. Any team could save millions of dollars by constantly rotating rookie contract backs through their system — and sure, there are a few teams that abide by this — but there’s a reason that even Malcolm Brown is still competing for carries in the league.

Brown is now with the Miami Dolphins and he’s again just one injury away from starting.

The Rams lost Brown in the offseason and didn’t replace him with a veteran presence. Then they lost Akers, and haven’t replaced him at all. While Henderson’s strengths could be in running outside zone and avoiding running through tackles, LA could potentially use a short-yardage, goal-line, or even receiving back to complement him in 2021. Should Henderson miss any time due to injury, a story that we know is far from a fantasy, then the Rams may need more than just a player to mix in a few times.

There are a few running back competitions going on around the NFL this August and these are some veterans who could be falling out of favor with their respective teams, making them available come September.

David Johnson, Texans

NFL.com’s Gregg Rosenthal recently noted that Johnson “does not look like a starter” and that he has fallen behind both Phillip Lindsay and Mark Ingram for touches. Behind them, Rex Burkhead. It’s not surprising to think that “Patriots: AFC South” likes to have a deep complement of specialized running backs and it could easily be the case that Houston wants to keep Johnson around, even if it’s only for 10-15 snaps per game. Battle Red Blog noted that Johnson’s special is “inside zone” and “can catch passes” so he might perfectly fit with what the Rams want to do.

The fact that former undrafted free agent Scottie Phillips is standing out after also making the final 53-man roster last season, could be another reason that Johnson will be moving soon. The Texans don’t save much by releasing Johnson, but that may not matter, and they could potentially finagle some more savings in trade.

Latavis Murray, Saints

Rosenthal also said that Murray “is not being treated like a guy necessarily guaranteed to make the team” in spite of his production with Asshole Face over the last two seasons and his experience at the position. The Saints added Devonta Freeman recently and they know that the backfield show belongs to Alvin Kamara.

I’m not sure I see Murray as a fit for what LA needs, however. He’s primarily been used as a first-and-10 back, not a goal line threat. Oddly, he did average exactly 4.5 yards per carry on each of first, second, and third down last season. But the vast majority of those reps came on first down, which seems like Henderson’s current territory. Murray may be more insurance to that then he would be a complementary piece.

Sony Michel, Patriots

The Texans aren’t the only team operating like the Patriots. There’s also the Patriots.

New England has Damien Harris as the lead back, plus James White, J.J. Taylor, Brandon Bolden, Rhamondre Stevenson, and Michel as complements. The breakout performances of Stevenson in training camp and the first preseason game suggests that the Patriots could feel comfortable with at least four running backs on the team, even after parting with Michel, if they choose to do so.

The former first round running back has not stood out in camp and he’s been talked about as being on the trading block for weeks, if not months.

Michel had 79 carries for 449 yards over nine games last season. In the two seasons prior to that, he was unquestionably the team’s number one option at the position, but his production and consistency waned between 2018 and 2019. Michel had six third down attempts in 2020 and he too was more of a first-and-10 back for the Patriots.

Here’s what Bernd Buchmasser of Pats Pulpit had to say:

So far, the Patriots have used Michel primarily as an early-down back with little usage in the passing game (despite him showing some promise in this area at Georgia). He has played in both zone and man-blocking schemes, and has found success both on off-tackle or bruising up the middle.

He’s not the most elusive runner, but he has a downhill mentality and knows how to read and follow his blocks.

He also has shown some good ball security, fumbling only three times in 649 career touches.

The main problems are his lack of versatility – or the Patriots’ lack of trust in him to play a more versatile role – and his injury issues. He’s currently in his fourth training camp, but it is the first he has not opened on PUP. When healthy and playing behind a stable offensive line, however, he can be a good back. Working as a 1B behind Damien Harris last year, he averaged a solid 5.7 yards per carry.

I’d also say he’s not the best player when it comes to making something out of nothing. If he has a good O-line he can be good, if not he will be inconsistent.

Benny Snell, Steelers

Rosenthal sees Snell, a fourth round pick out of Kentucky in 2019, as another player who has seen his stock slip dramatically over the last six months. The Steelers drafted Najee Harris to be the number one running back and they’ve been pleasantly surprised with the play of free agent Kalen Ballage. Anthony McFarland, a fourth round pick in 2020, appears to be the number two option.

Snell had 18 carries for 28 yards with zero touchdowns (but nine first downs) on third down last season. He scored four goal line touchdowns, but he hasn’t proven capable of being a receiver out of the backfield at any point in his football career.

Rashaad Penny, Seahawks

The hiring of former Rams offensive assistant Shane Waldron as the new offensive coordinator in Seattle made it seem like Penny was going to become “Darrell Henderson North” for the Seahawks this season. But for the third time in the last three years, Penny is missing time due to injury and Waldron seems to have other options at his disposal with Alex Collins and 2020 fourth round pick DeeJay Dallas as training camp/preseason standouts behind incumbent starter Chris Carson.

Seattle may stubbornly hold onto their 2018 first round pick — Penny went four picks ahead of Michel, who went four picks ahead of Nick Chubb, who went three picks ahead of Ronald Jones — as they did with C.J. Prosise for four years. But they might not be able to afford a roster spot for an oft-injured back with only 161 rushing attempts in three years.

Penny wouldn’t necessarily put McVay at ease with his backs situation, but he averaged 6.0 yards per carry on first-and-10 in 2019 and might be able to spell Henderson in certain situations.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,153

5 veteran running backs who may be falling out of favor — and could be available to Rams​

The question of whether or not the Los Angeles Rams need to add a running back to replace Cam Akers has yet to really present itself as necessary through the first three weeks of training camp. While Darrell Henderson is entrenched as the starter and won’t appear in the preseason, nobody between Xavier Jones, Jake Funk, or Raymond Calais has stood out — positively or negatively — enough to make the running back “numbers” obvious.

Last season, Sean McVay opted to enter Week 1 with Henderson, Akers, Malcolm Brown, and Jones, eventually adding Calais as a return option.

Injuries through training camp and early in the season prompted the inclusion of Brown into the offensive gameplan on a regular basis and it wasn’t until December that we really saw the impact that a play of Akers’ caliber could have on McVay’s offense. If the Rams are forced to include Jones, Funk, or Calais into the offense as a player getting 20, 30, or 40+ snaps in a game, we don’t know that’s a job that any of them are capable of executing.

We don’t even know if starting for 17 games is a job that Henderson can execute.

LA didn’t have a corresponding running back transaction to the Akers injury and I find that to be misleading. Though McVay may be giving Jones and Funk an opportunity to become complements to the offense in earnest, he wasn’t so forthcoming with snaps when it came to the rookie seasons of Henderson and Akers — and they were day two picks.

It is insulting and incorrect to believe that the mental aspect of football doesn’t apply to running backs. The concept that “running backs don’t matter” relies heavily upon the premise that running backs are mindless drones who only need to be fast and powerful and to be able to identify a lane to hit at 25 MPH. But the NFL is littered with veteran running backs that defy this premise because they aren’t the biggest, the fastest, or the strongest. Any team could save millions of dollars by constantly rotating rookie contract backs through their system — and sure, there are a few teams that abide by this — but there’s a reason that even Malcolm Brown is still competing for carries in the league.

Brown is now with the Miami Dolphins and he’s again just one injury away from starting.

The Rams lost Brown in the offseason and didn’t replace him with a veteran presence. Then they lost Akers, and haven’t replaced him at all. While Henderson’s strengths could be in running outside zone and avoiding running through tackles, LA could potentially use a short-yardage, goal-line, or even receiving back to complement him in 2021. Should Henderson miss any time due to injury, a story that we know is far from a fantasy, then the Rams may need more than just a player to mix in a few times.

There are a few running back competitions going on around the NFL this August and these are some veterans who could be falling out of favor with their respective teams, making them available come September.

David Johnson, Texans

NFL.com’s Gregg Rosenthal recently noted that Johnson “does not look like a starter” and that he has fallen behind both Phillip Lindsay and Mark Ingram for touches. Behind them, Rex Burkhead. It’s not surprising to think that “Patriots: AFC South” likes to have a deep complement of specialized running backs and it could easily be the case that Houston wants to keep Johnson around, even if it’s only for 10-15 snaps per game. Battle Red Blog noted that Johnson’s special is “inside zone” and “can catch passes” so he might perfectly fit with what the Rams want to do.

The fact that former undrafted free agent Scottie Phillips is standing out after also making the final 53-man roster last season, could be another reason that Johnson will be moving soon. The Texans don’t save much by releasing Johnson, but that may not matter, and they could potentially finagle some more savings in trade.

Latavis Murray, Saints

Rosenthal also said that Murray “is not being treated like a guy necessarily guaranteed to make the team” in spite of his production with Asshole Face over the last two seasons and his experience at the position. The Saints added Devonta Freeman recently and they know that the backfield show belongs to Alvin Kamara.

I’m not sure I see Murray as a fit for what LA needs, however. He’s primarily been used as a first-and-10 back, not a goal line threat. Oddly, he did average exactly 4.5 yards per carry on each of first, second, and third down last season. But the vast majority of those reps came on first down, which seems like Henderson’s current territory. Murray may be more insurance to that then he would be a complementary piece.

Sony Michel, Patriots

The Texans aren’t the only team operating like the Patriots. There’s also the Patriots.

New England has Damien Harris as the lead back, plus James White, J.J. Taylor, Brandon Bolden, Rhamondre Stevenson, and Michel as complements. The breakout performances of Stevenson in training camp and the first preseason game suggests that the Patriots could feel comfortable with at least four running backs on the team, even after parting with Michel, if they choose to do so.

The former first round running back has not stood out in camp and he’s been talked about as being on the trading block for weeks, if not months.

Michel had 79 carries for 449 yards over nine games last season. In the two seasons prior to that, he was unquestionably the team’s number one option at the position, but his production and consistency waned between 2018 and 2019. Michel had six third down attempts in 2020 and he too was more of a first-and-10 back for the Patriots.

Here’s what Bernd Buchmasser of Pats Pulpit had to say:

So far, the Patriots have used Michel primarily as an early-down back with little usage in the passing game (despite him showing some promise in this area at Georgia). He has played in both zone and man-blocking schemes, and has found success both on off-tackle or bruising up the middle.

He’s not the most elusive runner, but he has a downhill mentality and knows how to read and follow his blocks.

He also has shown some good ball security, fumbling only three times in 649 career touches.

The main problems are his lack of versatility – or the Patriots’ lack of trust in him to play a more versatile role – and his injury issues. He’s currently in his fourth training camp, but it is the first he has not opened on PUP. When healthy and playing behind a stable offensive line, however, he can be a good back. Working as a 1B behind Damien Harris last year, he averaged a solid 5.7 yards per carry.

I’d also say he’s not the best player when it comes to making something out of nothing. If he has a good O-line he can be good, if not he will be inconsistent.

Benny Snell, Steelers

Rosenthal sees Snell, a fourth round pick out of Kentucky in 2019, as another player who has seen his stock slip dramatically over the last six months. The Steelers drafted Najee Harris to be the number one running back and they’ve been pleasantly surprised with the play of free agent Kalen Ballage. Anthony McFarland, a fourth round pick in 2020, appears to be the number two option.

Snell had 18 carries for 28 yards with zero touchdowns (but nine first downs) on third down last season. He scored four goal line touchdowns, but he hasn’t proven capable of being a receiver out of the backfield at any point in his football career.

Rashaad Penny, Seahawks

The hiring of former Rams offensive assistant Shane Waldron as the new offensive coordinator in Seattle made it seem like Penny was going to become “Darrell Henderson North” for the Seahawks this season. But for the third time in the last three years, Penny is missing time due to injury and Waldron seems to have other options at his disposal with Alex Collins and 2020 fourth round pick DeeJay Dallas as training camp/preseason standouts behind incumbent starter Chris Carson.

Seattle may stubbornly hold onto their 2018 first round pick — Penny went four picks ahead of Michel, who went four picks ahead of Nick Chubb, who went three picks ahead of Ronald Jones — as they did with C.J. Prosise for four years. But they might not be able to afford a roster spot for an oft-injured back with only 161 rushing attempts in three years.

Penny wouldn’t necessarily put McVay at ease with his backs situation, but he averaged 6.0 yards per carry on first-and-10 in 2019 and might be able to spell Henderson in certain situations.
None of them really excite me.
 

TexasRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,117

5 veteran running backs who may be falling out of favor — and could be available to Rams​

The question of whether or not the Los Angeles Rams need to add a running back to replace Cam Akers has yet to really present itself as necessary through the first three weeks of training camp. While Darrell Henderson is entrenched as the starter and won’t appear in the preseason, nobody between Xavier Jones, Jake Funk, or Raymond Calais has stood out — positively or negatively — enough to make the running back “numbers” obvious.

Last season, Sean McVay opted to enter Week 1 with Henderson, Akers, Malcolm Brown, and Jones, eventually adding Calais as a return option.

Injuries through training camp and early in the season prompted the inclusion of Brown into the offensive gameplan on a regular basis and it wasn’t until December that we really saw the impact that a play of Akers’ caliber could have on McVay’s offense. If the Rams are forced to include Jones, Funk, or Calais into the offense as a player getting 20, 30, or 40+ snaps in a game, we don’t know that’s a job that any of them are capable of executing.

We don’t even know if starting for 17 games is a job that Henderson can execute.

LA didn’t have a corresponding running back transaction to the Akers injury and I find that to be misleading. Though McVay may be giving Jones and Funk an opportunity to become complements to the offense in earnest, he wasn’t so forthcoming with snaps when it came to the rookie seasons of Henderson and Akers — and they were day two picks.

It is insulting and incorrect to believe that the mental aspect of football doesn’t apply to running backs. The concept that “running backs don’t matter” relies heavily upon the premise that running backs are mindless drones who only need to be fast and powerful and to be able to identify a lane to hit at 25 MPH. But the NFL is littered with veteran running backs that defy this premise because they aren’t the biggest, the fastest, or the strongest. Any team could save millions of dollars by constantly rotating rookie contract backs through their system — and sure, there are a few teams that abide by this — but there’s a reason that even Malcolm Brown is still competing for carries in the league.

Brown is now with the Miami Dolphins and he’s again just one injury away from starting.

The Rams lost Brown in the offseason and didn’t replace him with a veteran presence. Then they lost Akers, and haven’t replaced him at all. While Henderson’s strengths could be in running outside zone and avoiding running through tackles, LA could potentially use a short-yardage, goal-line, or even receiving back to complement him in 2021. Should Henderson miss any time due to injury, a story that we know is far from a fantasy, then the Rams may need more than just a player to mix in a few times.

There are a few running back competitions going on around the NFL this August and these are some veterans who could be falling out of favor with their respective teams, making them available come September.

David Johnson, Texans

NFL.com’s Gregg Rosenthal recently noted that Johnson “does not look like a starter” and that he has fallen behind both Phillip Lindsay and Mark Ingram for touches. Behind them, Rex Burkhead. It’s not surprising to think that “Patriots: AFC South” likes to have a deep complement of specialized running backs and it could easily be the case that Houston wants to keep Johnson around, even if it’s only for 10-15 snaps per game. Battle Red Blog noted that Johnson’s special is “inside zone” and “can catch passes” so he might perfectly fit with what the Rams want to do.

The fact that former undrafted free agent Scottie Phillips is standing out after also making the final 53-man roster last season, could be another reason that Johnson will be moving soon. The Texans don’t save much by releasing Johnson, but that may not matter, and they could potentially finagle some more savings in trade.

Latavis Murray, Saints

Rosenthal also said that Murray “is not being treated like a guy necessarily guaranteed to make the team” in spite of his production with Asshole Face over the last two seasons and his experience at the position. The Saints added Devonta Freeman recently and they know that the backfield show belongs to Alvin Kamara.

I’m not sure I see Murray as a fit for what LA needs, however. He’s primarily been used as a first-and-10 back, not a goal line threat. Oddly, he did average exactly 4.5 yards per carry on each of first, second, and third down last season. But the vast majority of those reps came on first down, which seems like Henderson’s current territory. Murray may be more insurance to that then he would be a complementary piece.

Sony Michel, Patriots

The Texans aren’t the only team operating like the Patriots. There’s also the Patriots.

New England has Damien Harris as the lead back, plus James White, J.J. Taylor, Brandon Bolden, Rhamondre Stevenson, and Michel as complements. The breakout performances of Stevenson in training camp and the first preseason game suggests that the Patriots could feel comfortable with at least four running backs on the team, even after parting with Michel, if they choose to do so.

The former first round running back has not stood out in camp and he’s been talked about as being on the trading block for weeks, if not months.

Michel had 79 carries for 449 yards over nine games last season. In the two seasons prior to that, he was unquestionably the team’s number one option at the position, but his production and consistency waned between 2018 and 2019. Michel had six third down attempts in 2020 and he too was more of a first-and-10 back for the Patriots.

Here’s what Bernd Buchmasser of Pats Pulpit had to say:

So far, the Patriots have used Michel primarily as an early-down back with little usage in the passing game (despite him showing some promise in this area at Georgia). He has played in both zone and man-blocking schemes, and has found success both on off-tackle or bruising up the middle.

He’s not the most elusive runner, but he has a downhill mentality and knows how to read and follow his blocks.

He also has shown some good ball security, fumbling only three times in 649 career touches.

The main problems are his lack of versatility – or the Patriots’ lack of trust in him to play a more versatile role – and his injury issues. He’s currently in his fourth training camp, but it is the first he has not opened on PUP. When healthy and playing behind a stable offensive line, however, he can be a good back. Working as a 1B behind Damien Harris last year, he averaged a solid 5.7 yards per carry.

I’d also say he’s not the best player when it comes to making something out of nothing. If he has a good O-line he can be good, if not he will be inconsistent.

Benny Snell, Steelers

Rosenthal sees Snell, a fourth round pick out of Kentucky in 2019, as another player who has seen his stock slip dramatically over the last six months. The Steelers drafted Najee Harris to be the number one running back and they’ve been pleasantly surprised with the play of free agent Kalen Ballage. Anthony McFarland, a fourth round pick in 2020, appears to be the number two option.

Snell had 18 carries for 28 yards with zero touchdowns (but nine first downs) on third down last season. He scored four goal line touchdowns, but he hasn’t proven capable of being a receiver out of the backfield at any point in his football career.

Rashaad Penny, Seahawks

The hiring of former Rams offensive assistant Shane Waldron as the new offensive coordinator in Seattle made it seem like Penny was going to become “Darrell Henderson North” for the Seahawks this season. But for the third time in the last three years, Penny is missing time due to injury and Waldron seems to have other options at his disposal with Alex Collins and 2020 fourth round pick DeeJay Dallas as training camp/preseason standouts behind incumbent starter Chris Carson.

Seattle may stubbornly hold onto their 2018 first round pick — Penny went four picks ahead of Michel, who went four picks ahead of Nick Chubb, who went three picks ahead of Ronald Jones — as they did with C.J. Prosise for four years. But they might not be able to afford a roster spot for an oft-injured back with only 161 rushing attempts in three years.

Penny wouldn’t necessarily put McVay at ease with his backs situation, but he averaged 6.0 yards per carry on first-and-10 in 2019 and might be able to spell Henderson in certain situations.
I woudlnt mind giving Sony Michel a look. He has the ability to be a consistent back and may be playing with a chip on his shoulder.

Aint no way in hell I am looking at LeVeon Bell. Dude is a me first cancer that doesn't know when to shut his fat mouth.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,671
There's no way Sony Michel gets waived, and in the unlikely event he does, the Rams will be too far down the list to claim him.
He's also a bit Henderson-ish in that he gets hurt every year....