Not just you but I'm reading this a lot. He'll be 30 in a month coming off an acl injury with a roster bonus due and a contract that escalates in a couple of years. If not for the injury and the contract we absolutely could have gotten more for Woods. But those two factors are huge and drive the compensation way down. If we traded him after paying the roster bonus we get a better pick.
Last year I and others were beat to hell for questioning McSnead, and were throughout the season, now a lot of the same people are questioning McSnead for 1 trading Woods and 2 for not getting what they feel we should have.
I love Robert Woods and will always appreciate what he did for the Rams. But this deal makes sense unfortunately.
No offense intended, I don't even disagree....
... but there were posts exactly like this one to explain why moving on from Bruce after adding a "younger, bigger target" outside to replace him.
Whatever benefits the team got from it back then, it wasn't worth it. His presence in the locker room alone was worth his contract. That's when one small change to the chemistry can fuck up everything.
Now, I don't believe this is a bad move or bad business... but I just don't like it.
Losing Whitworth, Hekker and Woods in one offseason?
That's a megaton of invaluable leadership and character. The truth is nobody knows if we will regret this or not and there's no way for me to just believe that it won't come back to bite us...