Rams and Stafford Agree on Extension

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,053
Rodgers had one year left too, they were both free agents after 2022. And yes Stafford took less sorry to burst your bubble he easily could have gotten as much as Watson.
Rodgers was forcing a trade, its a totally different sitch
Alas, when fandom takes over rational thought
Its flat earth talk when folks are gonna try and say Rogers was "just under contract"
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,787
I'll wait till all the numbers come out but, Stafford got paid a bunch of money. The bottom line, for now, is the Rams get a lower cap hit for at least this year and secured Stafford for the future.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,053
You’re confusing societal value with NFL value.
Not one bit, I'm the guy who's been saying Stafford wouldnt sign for a penny under 40 mill for weeks when many were saying he'd "take on for the team" for significantly less.
But lets make him a hero for sacrificing a couple dollars. Please
But spare me the sacrificing for the greater good.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,053
I'll wait till all the numbers come out but, Stafford got paid a bunch of money. The bottom line, for now, is the Rams get a lower cap hit for at least this year and secured Stafford for the future.
And that's all that matters
Let the rest of the league panic over their QB, we're covered!
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,692
Name
Kupped
Rodgers was forcing a trade, its a totally different sitch
Alas, when fandom takes over rational thought
Its flat earth talk when folks are gonna try and say Rogers was "just under contract"
And Stafford could’ve easily done the same.
Again… you’re confusing how far Rodgers would go to get paid with actual leverage.
Think the Rams wouldn’t have paid him $45 if he demanded it? You think they’d allow a QB holdout coming off SB win?
My dude.
 

Jorgeh0605

You had me at meat tornado.
2023 ROD Fantasy Champion
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,916
Superbowl winning QB, whom we traded 2 first round picks, with the talent Stafford has, and coming in and winning a SUPER Bowl in year 1… he could have fleeced the rams and demanded he be the highest paid QB in the league by a margin. He could’ve pointed at Watsons 100% guarantee. He did none of that. He definitely took a team friendly deal.
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,692
Name
Kupped
Not one bit, I'm the guy who's been saying Stafford wouldnt sign for a penny under 40 mill for weeks when many were saying he'd "take on for the team" for significantly less.
But lets make him a hero for sacrificing a couple dollars. Please
But spare me the sacrificing for the greater good.
He did take less.
Unless you thought the new deal wasn’t going to include this season.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,053
He did take less.
Unless you thought the new deal wasn’t going to include this season.
43 mill per year
Market rate
Deserves every penny
I'll leave the fluff stuff for the Harlequin romance types that need to make it more than that
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,692
Name
Kupped
43 mill per year
Market rate
Deserves every penny
I'll leave the fluff stuff for the Harlequin romance types that need to make it more than that
Not over the length.
30 million less than Rodgers over same time.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,053
Significantly less than Watson and the deal came after Watson’s.
98067c2a5ffca29caec64a8fc99c72a0.gif
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,617
43 mill per year
Market rate
Deserves every penny
I'll leave the fluff stuff for the Harlequin romance types that need to make it more than that
Market rate for QB's are what the most recent deals were signed for. Stafford took less than that market.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,053
Market rate for QB's are what the most recent deals were signed for. Stafford took less than that market.
Josh Allen signed for 43 mill per year also (6 year 258) and Dak 40 mill per (4 for 160)
Yup, market value
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,452
Name
Mack
Could he have put the fire to the Rams FO and squeezed them for a bit more - sure of course because QBs have the power these days. Especially one who just won the SB.

But come on, it’s not like he took way less here. He simply didn’t screw the Rams. But the dude got PAID…let’s pull back slightly on the ball washing.

Hey, we need a lot of us to do all that ball washing...

Dude's got balls like a tour bus...one person could go bust on sponges alone...LOL
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,996
We did have to give him an extension, and it wasn't going to be for 20 million a year like we paid him last year. So its a fair deal, he could have got more, but he's being paid very well. Just glad that he will be our guy for the near future.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,617
Josh Allen signed for 43 mill per year also (6 year 258) and Dak 40 mill per (4 for 160)
Yup, market value
I thought your reading comprehension was better than that I apologize. I'll try again for you. The QB market is what the LAST QB signed for. There have been other QB's signed since those 2 in case you missed them.
 

wolfdogg

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,965
Name
wolfdogg
Matt's probably saving the rams 3 to 7 ml a year which is still a nice chunk of change, and that savings is also likely to help the rams sign a specific FA or trade addition.