Yep. 2 years as an OC and position wise, coaching QB's does at least seem to be a closer path than someone who was merely a position coach.
That's only what we see however. What we dont see is what ultimately gets a guy hired, and that is his interview and plan. Look at the most underrated great coach, Mike Tomlin. Only 1 year as a DC, and wasnt even an impressive year, but in his interview he blew the Steelers away with his plan and now he's 16 years as a Head Coach without ever having a losing season. Its truly incredible.
So who knows? Brown could be one of those guys too, he could blow away a team with his overall plan, we dont know.
Fair points. And I admit again that Zach was way better than I gave him credit for. It is a testament to McVay's eye for coaches tbh. He really does have a gifted eye for talent in his staff. And your point is a good one re: seeing the game through the QB and understanding that being a key element in transitioning to head coach. It's a pretty big part of things.
Way I read Brown's move to TEs was that McVay wanted to get him into the pass game coordinator track. But in spite of Higs' bottom line production I was not happy with either his performance snap to snap or the performance of the other options in that room. I was seeing him as a potential firing, which looking back on it now was a bit extreme, given how well he bounced back to the RB room. But the bottom line in all that is I don't see some high ceiling for him just because McVay loves him. I don't get to see guys performing in the staff and locker room, so I go by the unit and try to read into what I'm seeing there. These are the limits fans must deal with.
It's the same deal with the defense. Shula was being prepped to be DC by having him learn the secondary and it blew up in McVay's face the same way Brown to TEs did. No matter how much you might like a positional coach, the truth is some of them are not going to be good coordinators. And being a great positional coach does not mean you'll be a great coordinator. The mechanics of the jobs change from directly leading your own group to the chess game and leading through your positional coaches. Using Shula as an example, the poor play of the secondary makes me question whether he is worthy of being a DC. And I think Brown is not up to snuff to be an OC in the same way. So to consider either of them for head coach is a bridge too far for me even though I could of course be wrong.
Lastly I'll observe that to be as bad as Georgia was as an owner you'd need to make shitty head coach hires one after the other. There were other things she did wrong, like pinching pennies with players, but her issues started with poor hires. So as an owner I don't think it's wise to roll the dice on coordinators and risky lottery ticket type hires. Sure you could hit on one of them. But is it likely. And before you know it you're a shit owner.