albefree69
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 4,512
- Name
- Alan
es dos amigos :omg:albefree69 said:I'm really surprised about the release of Cody.![]()
Lesson as stunned as I am:
Both Davis', Hull, and Johnson/Veltung are the cuts that stand out to me the most.
Hull probably shocks me the most since that means the Rams would be carrying 4 UDFA LBs, correct? A. Davis was probably cut due to performance, but he really never ran with any 1s. He has more upside than Clemens.
Veltung/Johnson cuts mean, IMO, they view Cook more as a WR than a TE.
Cody being cut doesn't really shock me, but Daniels stepped up his game. Hopefully Woodard and Martin are signed to the PS.
albefree69 said:Not only did I like Hull's play (at MLB only), he's not eligible for the PS. How does that make sense if they signed WW because they needed more experience?
albefree69 said:Lesson as stunned as I am:
Both Davis', Hull, and Johnson/Veltung are the cuts that stand out to me the most.
Hull probably shocks me the most since that means the Rams would be carrying 4 UDFA LBs, correct? A. Davis was probably cut due to performance, but he really never ran with any 1s. He has more upside than Clemens.
Veltung/Johnson cuts mean, IMO, they view Cook more as a WR than a TE.
Cody being cut doesn't really shock me, but Daniels stepped up his game. Hopefully Woodard and Martin are signed to the PS.
Not only did I like Hull's play (at MLB only), he's not eligible for the PS. How does that make sense if they signed WW because they needed more experience?
A couple of weeks ago, I thought that 3 of those guys would make the team, but I can say that I'm not surprised that Bates made it after the way he played, including special teams, the last two weeks. They must be doing well in sessions too.Lesson said:albefree69 said:Lesson as stunned as I am:
Both Davis', Hull, and Johnson/Veltung are the cuts that stand out to me the most.
Hull probably shocks me the most since that means the Rams would be carrying 4 UDFA LBs, correct? A. Davis was probably cut due to performance, but he really never ran with any 1s. He has more upside than Clemens.
Veltung/Johnson cuts mean, IMO, they view Cook more as a WR than a TE.
Cody being cut doesn't really shock me, but Daniels stepped up his game. Hopefully Woodard and Martin are signed to the PS.
Not only did I like Hull's play (at MLB only), he's not eligible for the PS. How does that make sense if they signed WW because they needed more experience?
I think Witherspoon could play MLB if he had to, while Hull seems to be limited to only MLB.
Ray-Ray/Bates/Rivers/Stewart all making the roster is still shocking to me. I thought Ray-Ray and another one of the three would make the team, but not all 4.
When we acquired WW back in the day, he was a fantastic OLB who we immediately miscast in the role of MLB because we had none and hadn't had one ever since we screwed up by not resigning London Fletcher. Many of his best qualities were wasted. Hull is limited to MLB but I thought he was good there. Good and not great but what's all the talk about needing experience?Lesson reminding me of the past:
I think Witherspoon could play MLB if he had to, while Hull seems to be limited to only MLB.
Ray-Ray/Bates/Rivers/Stewart all making the roster is still shocking to me. I thought Ray-Ray and another one of the three would make the team, but not all 4.
den-the-coach surprising me:
I disagree Hull played poorly IMO & was kept mostly because of special teams. They might be looking to add another LB, but I felt Bates & Stewart offered far more upside than the slow footed Hull.
Yeah, that's the only explanation I can think of, which is why I didn't make any predictions about the final cuts. Too many practices we weren't able to monitor to make intelligent decisions. At least as far as I'm concerned.DR RAM surmising:
They must be doing well in sessions too.
JIMERAMS said:Ao we get rid of a sure tackler in Cody Davis and keep 2 injured safety's? What sence does that make. Is there some kind of hit we take on the cap if we release those two? Don't get it
i really thought he'd make it too, can't believe we kept Giordino or w/e his name is over him.albefree69 said:Cody started out really well but his play fell off in the last two games. I still thought he'd make it though. Like Tron, I'm hoping he makes the PS.
A55VA6 said:Overall I actually wasn't very impressed with Cody Davis. He was good, then he was bad. I thought he had a chance, but I wasn't as high on him as everyone else was.
:boing:JIMERAMS said:Ao we get rid of a sure tackler in Cody Davis and keep 2 injured safety's? What sence does that make. Is there some kind of hit we take on the cap if we release those two? Don't get it