Look, if here were free of course I'd want Beckham. Once you factor in the normal $3-5 million spending margin teams normally keep, plus the practice squad, the Rams will likely need to cut somebody to make room for him.* Add in the loss of the picks, and I don't think it makes sense. People complain about Watkins costing a second for a year's play - but at least he helped Goff develop, and helped the team make the playoffs. The team is likely to make the playoffs without him, and are arguably the favorite to win the Super Bowl.
Even though the Rams dont have to I'd gladly cut Barron and Webster to save about 8 million in cap space and replace that with OBJ's 8.5 million dollar salary this year.
I am not ready to place the Rams as superbowl favorites over the reigning Superbowl champs who are having a solid offseason in their own right. Rams may have more top end talent, but Im not sure they have depth to win a superbowl with their backup QB and backup LT. IMO Rams are neck and neck with the Vikings and slightly ahead of Saints. The NFC is stacked and at this point the Rams aren't just settling for making the playoffs they are going for it all. No other available talent would have the impact OBJ can. Unlike Watkins he would have an offseason and training camp develop some chemistry with Goff, learn the playbook, and give time for the coaches to learn about him. Also have the added benefit of working out together outside of the team confines since Goff, OBJ, Woods, and Kupp all live in LA in the offseason.
People are under estimating the jump most wide receivers take in their second year so they’re writing Josh Reynolds off If the Vikings gave up on guys are limited production after one year Diggs and Theilen would be on another team or watching the NFL.
I remember a similar debate last year when people were against drafting a TE early because we spent a 4th on Higbee the year before. My argument last year is the same as it is this year, the presence of those talented younger guys isn't going to stop me from adding top flight talent at that position. IMO that argument is even more pronounced when you have a bonafide stud like OBJ instead of a high upside rookie like Gerald Everett who projected perfectly for the Jordan Reed role.
Also this assertion that Watkins was our #1 WR is just silly. He was a deep threat to keep safeties honest. Robert Woods was our #1 and stats show opposing defenses felt so as they put their top corner on him more than Watkins.
I would like to see this stat because I clearly remember Patrick Peterson who always travels with ones traveling with Sammy. Definitely in one game, but Woods may have been injured the second Cards game. That's just one team's treatment I can think of off the top of my head, so I may be wrong. I think we can all agree Woods was the number 1 option in the spread the wealth passing game, but I also think some of that came from favorable matchups playing across from Sammy.