Allen2McVay
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2020
- Messages
- 8,810
- Name
- Jim
AND a defense against offensive odors...Kolone gives the Rams a backup Center in case Shelton gets injured during the game, on top of being a backup guard.
Yes we did recover. But we recovered by trading for a RB who could be counted on to ground out the tough yards. That got us back on track, just like a similar move got us back on track in 2018 which was eerily similar. Both offenses were floundering and one dimensional.But we recovered (adjustments, coaching, etc. - idk) somehow and the line held up enough for the SB win run. Hopefully we history repeats itself.
On a serious note, makes me laugh at those that think 300 is a play by play and historically accurate! haha And cringe a little...
Actually Les Snead goes back in time.Puts on a Tutu & looks in the mirror & thinks this doesn’t look good & draft Creed Humphries. Puts on the last Rocky Movie Creed & calls it History.AND a defense against offensive odors...
The article also said that Jeremiah Kolone finally got "elevated "after five seasons I bet he was beaming.AND a defense against offensive odors...
You are not the only one here that has this issue.....Yes we did recover. But we recovered by trading for a RB who could be counted on to ground out the tough yards. That got us back on track, just like a similar move got us back on track in 2018 which was eerily similar. Both offenses were floundering and one dimensional.
Rams still seem to think they have enough in that room right now though. Maybe they're right. But something is off with Akers and they are now counting on the guy who was not good enough in 2018 or 2021 to get us back on track.
I don't like being negative but there is a point where doing the same thing again and again and again and then thinking it's going to be different this time around starts to feel like that definition of insanity. If this does turn around without adding to that RB room I think it will be due to the pass game but I would love for Hendy to prove me wrong.
The problem is we draft our OL in rounds 4-7 or bring in UDFAs. Those players that are bonafide "run tough" lineman may be solid in the run game, but are horrible at pass pro. Or vise versa. And one thing we know after 6 years with McVay is he will 100% always choose pass blocking between the two.I sure would like to see some bonified "run tough" starting college OG selected in the draft.
Yeah, I didn’t even know most of the facts with that outside of the movie. When I read that book I was surprised to find their was others involved and at least 2-3 helpers for each spartan with him. LolI happened to watch the movie, and I thought it sucked. It billed itself as being a "portrayal of history", a glimpse into the 300 Spartans and their motives (not even mentioning the thousands of Athenians and other Greeks who were actually with the Spartans, but were sent home because they were afraid to die, while the Spartans weren't.) It failed at that. Then I look at the violent scenes, and honestly, I thought those were lame as well.
It was a shit movie that was only good for "THIS - IS - SPARTAAA!" memes.
No doubt. I do think the way his OL tends to wilt vs the best fronts drives him batshit. But his love of the pass game outweighs all else and it has gotten him results so yeah it's not gonna change.Thinking McVay is going to suddenly change his philosophy isn't going to happen. Maybe we try new starters or tweak positions. Maybe we use more 12 personnel formations and/or max protection pass concepts. But we will not all of a sudden turn into the 49ers and start prioritizing road grading OL at the detriment of pass blocking.
Well, we don't know if he would use a 1st rounder on the OL since he has yet to pick a player in the first round.The problem is we draft our OL in rounds 4-7 or bring in UDFAs. Those players that are bonafide "run tough" lineman may be solid in the run game, but are horrible at pass pro. Or vise versa. And one thing we know after 6 years with McVay is he will 100% always choose pass blocking between the two.
In order to get lineman that are good at both, you need to draft them in rounds 1-2. Or spend big money in FA. Of course you can hit the lotto and get lucky finding a late round gem, but even when we've had a top prospect on the board staring us in the face, at a position of need even (Humphrey), we still chose to draft an offensive weapon and bring in late round lineman instead. Its a philosophical flaw and real blind spot that McVay has.
Thinking McVay is going to suddenly change his philosophy isn't going to happen. Maybe we try new starters or tweak positions. Maybe we use more 12 personnel formations and/or max protection pass concepts. But we will not all of a sudden turn into the 49ers and start prioritizing road grading OL at the detriment of pass blocking.
Mid to late round picks will have holes in their game. Maybe they can be coached up, maybe not. Maybe you find a gem that becomes a 10yr starter. But the probability is very low.Well, we don't know if he would use a 1st rounder on the OL since he has yet to pick a player in the first round.
His 2nd's have been late 2nd's and it's not clear if they avoided the OL when they had picks there as they have tended to select needs that were there for skill players.
Akers was a need in light of Gurley's release. Jefferson was a need as they lacked WR depth. Rapp was a need because they lacked safeties at the time, and Everett was a need since they had zero TE depth back then and Higbee was a huge question mark.
They did spend 3rd's on Evans & Bruss. Those are relatively high picks for guards. Also a 3rd on Noteboom & 4th on Allen.
So it's not like they only address the OL in the last 2 rounds.
Well apparently in their mind the interior OL was not that huge a need. They had confidence in Allen, Corbett, Edwards, etc... I remember McVay pointing out that their top 9 ir 10 OL were all coming back and they felt there was no need to replace anyone in that group.Mid to late round picks will have holes in their game. Maybe they can be coached up, maybe not. Maybe you find a gem that becomes a 10yr starter. But the probability is very low.
The talent is at the top of the draft, so using your top pick on a position group shows the urgency with which you want to upgrade that position. We haven't had a 1st rounder you're right, but we've had multiple 2nd round picks and have not used them on OL. After picking Jefferson a year prior, and after signing DJax in free agency - giving us two deep threats on the roster, we still chose to draft Tutu over Humphries when interior OL was a huge question mark for us. We dont need any more evidence beyond that to show how McVay feels about spending premium picks on OL. Will that change in the future? Hopefully yes. But through 6 years its been a glaring hole in his philosophy that cost us 2019 and could potentially derail this year too.
Van Jefferson and DJax were both on the roster.Now, Tutu may have been a reach, but McVay apparently felt speed at the WR position was a huge need ans not currently on that roster at that point. So they took a shit with him.
Yeah, McVay must not understand the capabilities of his players. You must be right.Van Jefferson and DJax were both on the roster.