Well, we'd only owe him $4.1 million. We could invoke the fifth year option retain leverage, or we could choose to let him walk and take the comp pick if we felt his demands are unreasonable. We'd have some flexibility. I wouldn't expect them to pay him like Gurley unless he put up a MVP caliber season. In that case, yeah, pay that man for 3 to 4 years. And then walk away (because his career is likely over at that point).
I'm so with you on this
If it truly only costs a 4th or 5th, this seems to be a no brainer.
Make the trade, opt out of the 5th year deal.
If he's amenable to a 2 year deal to help cap, great. If not, so be it.
He plays for the 4 mill, plays for a contract. If he kills it, and wants big $$, he likely brings back a comp pick equal to or greater than what was paid for him. If he doesnt play well, let him go. Cant see how he wouldnt play well enough to at least get a contract elsewhere.
On a side note, (not directed at you jrry) I see the idea of drafting an RB in round 3-5 as opposed to trading for a true commodity thrown around as if there's certainty whoever drafted will play as well as Fournette.
That's laughable. Sure, there's a Demarco Murray and Alvin Kamara drafted in that range, but on the whole? Man, a whole lot of nothin...
From 2009-2019, there were 110 RB drafted between rds 3-5. Out of those 110 guys, how many achieved more than Fournette's 2,631 career rushing yards?
9 guys.
9 out of 110.
Only 17 of 110 guys rushed for over 2,000 yards in their career and a whopping 72 out of 110 didnt even rush for 1,000 total yards in their career (including our very own Tre Mason)
Will they get him? Who knows. Wont be sweat off my back if they dont. But I do believe they need to get somebody who is more proven than what's in the stable, and some mid round draftee. If the Rams arent a threat to run, and are 1 dimensional, I just dont see long term success