- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
- Messages
- 18,185
- Name
- Haole
On that fumble.
Sometimes the defender just makes a great play.
I'm not done with Cookie yet. I'm not happy with his production, but I'll bet he comes up big in some of the remaining games this season.
Psh, that's very generous for Cook, a lot of balls have just fallen right out of his hands, a couple have been good plays but there's many more incompletions that could be credited to Cook, and why just look at this season?Since you didn't put it in blue I presume you are serious even though he is credited with only 3 drops this year?
No doubt about it he could have played better and so could the rest of the offense. I don't keep stats but there are others who do and if there had been more than 3 catchable balls that he dropped they would be registered.Psh, that's very generous for Cook, a lot of balls have just fallen right out of his hands, a couple have been good plays but there's many more incompletions that could be credited to Cook, and why just look at this season?
Look at Cook's total body of work and it's not so hard to imagine that maybe, just maybe Cook has earned the moniker of unreliable.
Stats are easily skewed and missed and messed up. I use sportingcharts and they also miss things, like remember Quick's drop in Green Bay?No doubt about it he could have played better and so could the rest of the offense. I don't keep stats but there are others who do and if there had been more than 3 catchable balls that he dropped they would be registered.
Here is a link to a sight that keeps the stats http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/drops/2015/
I'd call BS on any stat saying Cook has only 3 drops this year.
There is a difference between being bad and being a bad value.
Cook is a bad value. I know we want to paint him as bad - but he isn't bad - he is just bad value.
He still needs to be accounted for out there - and even if it doesn't show up on the stat sheet, that matters.
A safety has to think about it before creeping too close to the LOS in ways that they just wouldn't if it were Justice Cunningham lined up out there.
So I'm all for cutting him in the offseason - when we can actually save some cap money and then use it productively, but its pointless to cut him now. I'd trade him if I could get halfway decent value - but not just cut him because he is a bad value - we are pot committed on him for this year.
Unfortunately I could only like this post once. I would rather put Cunningham and Harkey out there, because at minimum they are good blockers. They may offer little in the pass game, but it's not like Cook is giving us much. It took forever for Fisher/Snead to cut bait with Pead, looks like they will do the same with Cook. He better be off the team next year.What's the difference, really, between Cook and Pead? Both are physical specimens. Both can make some eye-popping plays. Both are as fast as the day is long, and both tend to disappoint with inopportune fumbles and inexplicable brain-farts.
Cook is playing like Pead was when he got cut. I guess the big difference is that there's no Gurley or Mason or even Cunningham (well... Bennie Cunningham) competing with Cook for targets.
Problem is there aren't a lot of Jason Witten types that come out often at all. He has been an underrated TE which is crazy since he plays for the Cowboys.Really hope a Jason Witten type TE is on our priority list this offseason if we want Gurley to have more lead blockers or open lanes. Seeing a 1 WR, 3 TE set with Quick / Kendricks, Harkey, and the 2016 rookie with Gurley in the backfield would make me cream my pants.
Justice Cunningham can absolutely block and I would absolutely love to see him on that right side some more.I also think Cunningham can execute in the run game better than Cook. I'll take my chances with their drops over Cooks.
But if we insist on keeping Cook, I'd keep him off the field except in select situations.