lockdnram21
Legend
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 5,348
No he isn't. He can't block and he's about 50/50 when it comes to catching.Unfortunately he's the best tight end on the team. I really hope we start to see less of him though. It's one thing to disappear, but when you reappear only to fumble, that's a problem.
Unfortunately he's the best tight end on the team. I really hope we start to see less of him though. It's one thing to disappear, but when you reappear only to fumble, that's a problem.
I agree.I totally disagree that he's the best TE on the team.
Cook has hands of stone, does not block and is prone to fumble.
At least Harkey and Kendriks can block.
Agree 100%Quick > Cook effective immediately. He will block just as well, but catch the ball. Quick also brings size to the equation and would help this offense greatly on hot read slants across the middle. The exact route that Cook would F up by either dropping it, fumbling it, or knocking it in the air for an INT.
Also I'm not advocating cutting him. I am suggesting that Fish or Cigs man the F up and hold his player accountable for poor play by sitting him. How many games has he not played well now? So many times he should have been given a diminished role or benched outright, yet here he is again hurting the team.
The Rams have other options schematically. Run more 3 wide with Quick running Cook's routes. Rams will immediately be a better team.
Kendricks has good hands, actually. Turns out he was likely dropping balls this year because of the hand injury. He should be back to normal after his recovery.
There was another play at the goal line where Cook was open and Foles did not get him the ball.
We need to think of him as a WR. One that doesn't block as well as Britt, Quick, Austin, and Bailey.
Just to drop it? Cook doesn't make clutch plays. Ever. He is terrible when he needs to be at his very best. Maybe Foles sees an open Cook as unworthy?