What Vikings Fans Are Saying

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
@Rabid Ram and @NorvZimmer......sigh. :palm:

Personally I would like the Vikings fans to come back next week and cue us in on our next opponent the Bears, who they beat 23-20 in their last game. After facing both the Bears and the Rams in their last two games, these guys should have some interesting points of view. Burning bridges won't allow that to happen.
Sorry prime ad I said though I have enjoyed Every other viking poster whose been here. I just can not stand fan of any team Rams included to come to the board claiming false stats and info insulting other posters and taking shots about how uninformed and homeristic our board thinking we won't see it. Tbh I'm still confused why hes still here. You have more patience and apathy then I
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prime Time
Hey Prime, what is the money or credit you get in this site? Never seen that on a fan forum before.
 
@Rabid Ram and @NorvZimmer......sigh. :palm:

Personally I would like the Vikings fans to come back next week and cue us in on our next opponent the Bears, who they beat 23-20 in their last game. After facing both the Bears and the Rams in their last two games, these guys should have some interesting points of view. Burning bridges won't allow that to happen.
I will be back.
 
And sure, I will come back next week's to give you info on bears. Do you play them in Chicago or st louis ?

In St. Louis.

You have more patience and apathy then I

Blessed are the peacemakers. :flanders:

Hey Prime, what is the money or credit you get in this site? Never seen that on a fan forum before.

It's ROD dollars we give out for different things that enhance the forum, such as getting likes and starting threads, to be used in our Sportsbook section for making bets.

I will be back.

Thank you Terminator. (y) One of our fan bases will relate to this after the game. :)


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aLR-8c11ms
 
Lets see what both us Vikings fans and Rams fan pick...

A. 25 receptions, 419 yards, 2 td's, 2 fumbles
1 carry, 9 yards

B. 24 receptions, 285 yards, 4 td's, 1 fumble
17 carries, 141 rushing yards, 2 td's
12 punt returns, 135 yards, 1 td

I'll take B every time.

Yards are nice and all....but td's matter more.

Diggs a stud wr not denying that, we could use him big time, but to act like he is well above Austin is ludicrous..
There is a danger with B. Also, A is a rookie who has been used in one capacity because the team has other players who can do the other things. He doesn't have to run back punts or be a RB as well as a WR.

Just what do you do when B gets hurt? If one player is responsible for most of your scoring, when he goes down your team is screwed. Notice how the Packers are all of a sudden average? Yes, they have been winning, but not like last year. Last year they would have put 44 points on the Rams at Lambeau. Their biggest problem is they lost Jordy Nelson and have no one to take up the slack.
 
Hey Prime, what is the money or credit you get in this site? Never seen that on a fan forum before.

Credit is earned by participation; posts, topics, and likes.

$50 for creating a topic
$20 per post
$2 for recieving a like, etc.

You can then use the credit in the Sportsbook section of the forum to place wagers.

Here, we reset our cash system at the start of each league year.

It's strictly for fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sgt. Ram
@Rabid Ram and @NorvZimmer......sigh. :palm:

Personally I would like the Vikings fans to come back next week and cue us in on our next opponent the Bears, who they beat 23-20 in their last game. After facing both the Bears and the Rams in their last two games, these guys should have some interesting points of view. Burning bridges won't allow that to happen.

They would just predict the bears beating the Rams because the bears played the vikings tough and we only beat the vikings by 20 points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamzFanz
In St. Louis.



Blessed are the peacemakers. :flanders:



It's ROD dollars we give out for different things that enhance the forum, such as getting likes and starting threads, to be used in our Sportsbook section for making bets.



Thank you Terminator. (y) One of our fan bases will relate to this after the game. :)


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aLR-8c11ms

I think the bears are much tougher at soldier field, so the fact that you are playing at home bodes well for you.
 
Credit is earned by participation; posts, topics, and likes.

$50 for creating a topic
$20 per post
$2 for recieving a like, etc.

You can then use the credit in the Sportsbook section of the forum to place wagers.

Here, we reset our cash system at the start of each league year.

It's strictly for fun.

Its only fun money? Then disregard the PM I sent you on where to send the check. :whistle:
 
The best part about the Vikings winning today is going to see you complain, after I laugh at that I will be gone and never have to see you again.
That will be nice.

SKOL Vikings!
24-17
The sad part is you probably could have really contributed to this thread if you tried. Instead you've boosted your team with hand picked stats and attacked Rams players. Then when Rams fans defend their players you attack them all the while laughing at people who do the same to Vikings players in return. I'm pretty sure most every Rams fan in here has said this will be a good close game. We'd all feel more confident if it was at home but that's the way the scheduling gods work. They don't like the Rams. My prediction has been Rams 17-16 in a close game decided in the 4th quarter. Either way I'm proud of the Rams and look forward to the rest of the year.
 
While I don't have a problem with fans of other teams posting here for the most part. I believe when you come on a Rams board and refer to them as lambs. Well that takes a particular type of arrogance. Especially when it is not necessary to make your point. And to point fingers and say well he did it first, well thats just school yard crap. Certain words and terms are calculated to get a desired response. So one should not act offended when they get what they want. Go! Rams!
 
So, if the Vikings beat the Rams, the Rams will be 4-4. And they still will not have beat a winning team. Damn! :)
Um, the Rams have beaten the 6-2 Cardinals at their own place, which is one more win against a winning team than the Vikings. While we're at it, the Vikings haven't even beaten a .500 team, which the Rams also did when they beat Seattle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dodgersrf
Um, the Rams have beaten the 6-2 Cardinals at their own place, which is one more win against a winning team than the Vikings. While we're at it, the Vikings haven't even beaten a .500 team, which the Rams also did when they beat Seattle.
I think he's saying the vikings will still not of beaten a team over .500, not the Rams.

Though beating a 4-3 team and making them .500 is beating a team with a winning record...kinda.
 
I think he's saying the vikings will still not of beaten a team over .500, not the Rams.

Though beating a 4-3 team and making them .500 is beating a team with a winning record...kinda.
until the end (or week 14/15) this is basically a pointless stat or one the holds merit with the past season. its like when the networks put up a stat like "havent defeated team X this century" when they only play every 4 years and they could all be road games, or better yet, dont even include players on the field in the current game.
 
Vikings fans, win or lose, your cheerleaders aren't NFL standard.
 
Lambs, queens, what's the difference?
Oh wait the difference is because this is YOUR BOARD you are allowed to talk crap and claim other fans opinionsare wrong. But since I am not a rams fan I cannot.
Ok buddy, I think I will just put you on ignore.
If no one else will say it I will. Use the term "lambs" again here and I will boot you. We like having fans of other teams here but that won't be tolerated.