Why? The precedent has been set now. Cheat all you want you'll still be able to call yourselves champs and wear your rings. The team loses a couple draft picks the coach and gm get fired for a year before they get hired back and your billionaire owner pays a pittance of a penalty. MLB and NFL are encouraging cheaters.I do feel like there should be some structure in the league laws that covers cheating. Coaches (who set the tone with a locker room and who are responsible for the on field product) that are party to that should be fired for a first offense, and banned thereafter. This would put a lot of pressure on them to ensure things are clean.
If cheating goes to the owner level, there should be a clause that allows the other owners to force a sale. That's the only type of thing they would fear.
Players it's a bit more complicated. I'm sure one could come up with fair rules to apply to them but is it worthwhile. In the Astros' case (where players are a big part of something going on) is it possible for an NFL team to have players run a scandal like that? I just don't know how feasible that is to the way the NFL is structured but it would be fair to say they should be included with bans of varying degrees.
What you guys need to understand is the NFL is listed as a Entertainment business legally, not a Sports entity since JFK gave them that exception in the 60’s. The Fuckery goes way back before the 2001 SB and subsequent cover up. That’s just what woke most of us up to something isn’t right here.
Ive found by research quite a bit of things this off season that has questioned my fandom towards the NFL and my team. Most of which I haven’t been able to dismiss.
Something I thought only quacks said the NFL is like the WWE. Now I’m starting to think there is some slivers to that truth that are pretty insurmountable due to fact checking, not to mention other things that are highly probable.
I might make one tomorrow. The question is Rams talk? Other sports? Off topic?Quality discussion.
^ That sounds like a thread, all itself.
Rams talk
Off topic?
On One hand I am furious that my sports teams have been cheated out of multiple Super Bowls and World series Championships.
On the other hand I am confused how much I care about young men running around in matching outfits playing a game with a ball. Men of who I don't know or will ever speak to or get a dime from.
Curse my uncles who brainwashed me to believe there was great importance to the outcome of a sportsball game.
Don’t know if that should be in blue or not but here is a an excerpt of a great post from a Broncos website:
2. The NFL possesses an Anti-Trust Exemption to the law granted to it by President John F. Kennedy, which ultimately allows the NFL to classify itself as "entertainment" rather than sport, as well as incorporate itself as a single entity instead of the 32 separate "franchises" they would want you to believe. Contrary to the perception of the NFL being 32 separate franchises battling it out for gridiron supremacy. In a franchised environment, such as McDonalds (Business 101), each franchise is individually owned and operated and can participate in national promotions, have its own local promotions, or abstain from participating (hence the fine print in commercials saying "at participating locations".
This keeps the regionality of competition in tact without having to compete on a national level. MLB has this status, the NFL does not. Instead, since the NFL has this Anti-Trust exemption, it is able to package its teams in order to sell to national television companies, which today totals $6 Billion in revenue for the league. That is 75% of the leagues total annual revenue. In a 2004 lawsuit vs the NFL, the NFL attorney Gregg H. Levy argued that "the NFL is not a collection of 32 individual teams, but rather a single entity. And as long as the NFL teams are a unit, and they compete as a unit in the entertainment marketplace, then they should be deemed a single unit and not subject to any Anti-Trust laws."
There is only another "sports" organization that I can think of that follows this, the WWE. Levy also argued that the league markets its products and merchandise as a whole to promote the NFL as a whole. These arguments led all the way to lockout during the 2011 offseason. The league would still earn $5 Billion in revenue, even without a single game being played.
Professional sports is the only industry without ANY federal oversight. Therefore the league can do and go as they see fit, this is something the players were concerned about going into the lockout, the NFL players themselves sought help from US Congress asking for oversight of the NFL. And NFL players wanted an explanation as to why the NFL owners were granted an Anti-Trust exemption in the first place. They didn't get it.
The NFL proved in this lawsuit that they see themselves as a single unit in the "entertainment" industry and the unique league revenue sharing strategy is not common amongst professional sports leagues.”
Plenty of FBI investigations and documents compiled corroborate these sentiments.
Wherever threads about UFO sightings, flat earth philosophies or other whacked out conspiracy theories would go. This "theory" was the rage a bunch of years ago and was debunked then.I might make one tomorrow. The question is Rams talk? Other sports? Off topic?
Your post summed things up nicely for how I feel on the subject. The difference in the two leagues is glaring, and surprises me on the heels of all the roid BS of yesteryear.In MLB, the GMs and coaches of the cheating teams have been FIRED.
Your post summed things up nicely for how I feel on the subject. The difference in the two leagues is glaring, and surprises me on the heels of all the roid BS of yesteryear.
The Astros should be suspended for a year. The whole team. The trophy taken away. That would put end to future cheating and all the controversy.I do feel like there should be some structure in the league laws that covers cheating. Coaches (who set the tone with a locker room and who are responsible for the on field product) that are party to that should be fired for a first offense, and banned thereafter. This would put a lot of pressure on them to ensure things are clean.
If cheating goes to the owner level, there should be a clause that allows the other owners to force a sale. That's the only type of thing they would fear.
Players it's a bit more complicated. I'm sure one could come up with fair rules to apply to them but is it worthwhile. In the Astros' case (where players are a big part of something going on) is it possible for an NFL team to have players run a scandal like that? I just don't know how feasible that is to the way the NFL is structured but it would be fair to say they should be included with bans of varying degrees.
It has everything to do with the topic ‘cheating’.This has nothing to do with the topic. How the NFL is structured as an entity has nothing to do with cheating or games being fixed.
Also how do you know only the WWE follows the same guidelines? And what the hell does that have to do with anything anyway.
The obvious "it's fixed/fake/predetermined" comparison to WWE is a myth debunked many times over and for many years.
Wherever threads about UFO sightings, flat earth philosophies or other whacked out conspiracy theories would go. This "theory" was the rage a bunch of years ago and was debunked then.
All this nonsense started with some frivolous lawsuit that went nowhere.
Sadly, I doubt the Astros are the only team in all of baseball that ever cheated in winning an MLB Championship.
Yes it was debunked.No it wasn’t debunked. It’s fact. As a business entity it’s listed as ‘Sports Entertainment’. Pull financial records and look it up.
Just because a professional skeptic is just as ludicrous as a professional conspiracy theorist that believes anything.
Speaking of that lawsuit the NFL’s lawyers argued that it’s a ‘sport entertainment’ industry as per the transcripts of the proceedings. But that’s whacko nonsense right?