That hit on Cooks
- Thread starter Jacobarch
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Classic Rams
Hall of Fame
Yeah that and the way the defender slammed Kupp to the ground I thought ouch then he gets back up and trots off. Those type of extra swings to put the player down hard should be called if they're gonna protect against concussions. Don't want the game turned to flag but the Seattle defender could've still tackled him without the extra emphasis to slam him like that.
There was a long run by the seacocks late in the game, and at the end an OL comes in and blows up our guy, in the back....nothing....I mean just 3 blind mice out there. It was as bad a game for the officials as I've seen in some time.
Montanaramfan
Rookie
Are you talking about the run where Gurley clearly got the first but they marked him two yards short? That was total BS.
It's hard to see from that angle, but the helmet doesn't contact him first. His shoulder and elbow are what first hit Cooks in the head. There might have been a little bit of incidental helmet contact later, but he didn't initially strike with the helmet. It's still an illegal hit imo.
saw a lot less of a hit called in dallas game just now.
These refs were shit. Cleve Bitchman ought to be ashamed of himself for the many disgusting no-calls that he made.
Agreed, it's hard to tell from this angle, but the main thrust of the force was from the DB's shoulder to Cooks' helmet. Regardless, the DB was clearly targeting the helmet, and I hope he gets a huge fine.
That was an intentional, dirty play that could threaten Cooks' career. One more big concussion to Cooks and he could have a recurring problem.
Edit: just reading up about Cooks' concussion, and (unfortunately) it looks like he lost consciousness briefly, which is a sign that his concussion was more severe than the one sustained by Kupp.
Refs effin disgust me tbh. So inconsistent it's ridiculous.
And don't even get me started on the way teams just hold AD and company. It's stupid.
And don't even get me started on the way teams just hold AD and company. It's stupid.
not just about the leading with the helment.. its also about hit on a defenseless receiver.
The Shecocks were amped up today. This was a playoff game for them. They knew if they fell behind the Rams by 3 games it was going to be a long hard crawl to get back into the hunt. I think they decided they would not go down without a fight and leave everything on the field!
Admittedly a close call.
But my eyes see the helmet clearly hitting Cooks head before the pads.
RamsOfCastamere
I drink things, and know nothing
A terrible hit but Cooks should not crouch head first like that.
You keep cluttering the issue with facts and sitting focus away from the narrative... Stop that.
I try to look at these 'no call' hits on Rams players from the lens of how I would feel about it if the situation was reversed. Like if, for instance, Johnson III leveled that hit on a Seahawks receiver. I'm fairly certain I would blame the receiver for going fetal while Johnson was trying to lead with his shoulder.
I keep watching that video, looking at the stills that @SWAdude posted, and wondering how you came to the conclusion that it wasn't helmet to helmet. I respect the hell out of you, but I've no clue how you would look at that and reasonably determine that the helmets didn't collide prior to or at the same time as the shoulder pads got each other.
@-X- if it was our guy doing the hitting, I'd be thrilled that they didn't call it because it's clear. If they had called it, I'd be pissed at the NFL, not the ref.