- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 15,439
3rd and 22
thanks. I wasn’t able to see the game & was following on game cast. Whatever the down, you still can’t give up that first down on the marker.
3rd and 22
Activate our Bionic Rookie ... NOW!!!
If he's not ready to play, give him another week. It's only early in week two.
This.... Makes me very happy.
I think you’d rather things play out in a way that, in your mind, validates your doomsaying, than see the team prove you wrong and succeed.Hmmm, how can an impact player just disappear? I've been saying why for weeks. The defensive scheme is why. Samson trained his whole career to play one position, the OLB SAM in a 3-4 hybrid system.
In comes Staley with his variation of a 3-4. You can easily see it's not an attacking, penetrating style of defense. How the first tipoff is that the NT plays a 0 two-gap technique. Yes the DE and DT both play a one-gap technique but it has the effect of allowing the o-line to focus upon them as a 0 T NT isn't a real pass rush threat.
Staley doesn't use an OLB SAM, and in fact, rarely does his defense cover the flats. His defense is all about read first and then react which allows the advantage to pass to the offense. Watch his pass rush closely and you will see them playing contain first and pressure second. Why do you think AD's impact is down while playing against weak opponents? It's not just Ebukam or Okoronkwo. Staley doesn't turn his pass rush loose until the offense is around the Ram's 40. That is such a weak defensive scheme. He's playing not to lose not to win. Against top opponents that will get shredded and the offense might not be able to keep up.
Just like the changes in the offensive o-line blocking scheme has made a huge difference in their play with the exact same personnel is proof of what I'm saying. Staley's scheme for his front 7 is causing the problem. He doesn't seem to know how to match his personnel for the defense he wants to play. This is symptomatic of a rookie DC who is trying to fit the players into his scheme, not play the scheme to fit the players he has. Unless Staley changes his defense will get shredded by the top offenses. When it happens everyone will say it's the lack of player talent the same way they cried about the o-line personnel. I was right about that and I'm right about this.
Hmmm, how can an impact player just disappear? I've been saying why for weeks. The defensive scheme is why. Samson trained his whole career to play one position, the OLB SAM in a 3-4 hybrid system.
In comes Staley with his variation of a 3-4. You can easily see it's not an attacking, penetrating style of defense. How the first tipoff is that the NT plays a 0 two-gap technique. Yes the DE and DT both play a one-gap technique but it has the effect of allowing the o-line to focus upon them as a 0 T NT isn't a real pass rush threat.
Staley doesn't use an OLB SAM, and in fact, rarely does his defense cover the flats. His defense is all about read first and then react which allows the advantage to pass to the offense. Watch his pass rush closely and you will see them playing contain first and pressure second. Why do you think AD's impact is down while playing against weak opponents? It's not just Ebukam or Okoronkwo. Staley doesn't turn his pass rush loose until the offense is around the Ram's 40. That is such a weak defensive scheme. He's playing not to lose not to win. Against top opponents that will get shredded and the offense might not be able to keep up.
Just like the changes in the offensive o-line blocking scheme has made a huge difference in their play with the exact same personnel is proof of what I'm saying. Staley's scheme for his front 7 is causing the problem. He doesn't seem to know how to match his personnel for the defense he wants to play. This is symptomatic of a rookie DC who is trying to fit the players into his scheme, not play the scheme to fit the players he has. Unless Staley changes his defense will get shredded by the top offenses. When it happens everyone will say it's the lack of player talent the same way they cried about the o-line personnel. I was right about that and I'm right about this.