Tano
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2017
- Messages
- 10,009
I consider fairly tight any times a DB was within 5 yards or less of the receiver. I see quite a few more plays where at least one DB was within 5 yards of the receiver and that was what I meant. Sorry for being so vague. However, in the 4th quarter, Morris went back to having both CBs being off 7 yards or more the majority of the plays.Then why do people say it?
Why don't they look at the film? What is wrong with the truth? Start from there and then get into the details.
I've seen you recently post that the Rams played fairly tight coverages in the Tampa game ... when it is just not true.
I think people got frustrated and then would exaggerate, get angry, and not want the facts.
Not saying that is you, but I saw those kinds of comments from people. Some even going over the line (not saying you) by saying Morris was stupid and scared.
I think if people really wanted to know they could find the facts.
here is an example, back you you saying that Rams bade Brady "fairly tight" -- well that is a vague term and can be a misnomer, but will work with it.
Here are stills of all the snaps --- and circled is how many times the Rams were showing press. It was no more earlier -- you can divide by 1st half and 2nd half or 1st 3 Qs vs 4th-- but slice it how you want but what you think happened didn't happen
What did happen is yeah, they played off and "off means 8-10 yards (not 15) and it cost them the game ... there are specific details of that last drive, but that's a convo for another time.
But what you must also consider is that if the Rams can get 10 yards after a defensive stop then they win. And what was explained by Jourdan is there was a connection between the coverage to the offense last year.
To have proper discussions critics cannot continue to make accusations without any proof just "what they saw and remember" when they have the ability to see the film - but choose not to.
THEN you can get to a place of "I don't like it" and not this annoying (not saying you) "They played 15 yards off and that is WHY they lost". Opinions are fine, but opinions backed by evidence are more meaningful, IMO
But, see for yourself.
View attachment 63697View attachment 63698View attachment 63699View attachment 63700
My complaint with Morris was he consistently played both CBs 7 yards or more last year in the majority of the games even with having Ramsey. But after they got rid of the majority of the Assistant Coaches or putting them back to where they had shown they were good at and playing a lot more aggressively this year with CBs that aren't considered top of the line, I am sticking with the thought that a lot of last year had to do with the Assistant Coaches and Morris covering for them.
As to what Jourdan is saying about last year, I believe that is just an excuse the Rams came up with to cover for having such bad Assistant Coaches. McVay is not going to put down his assistant coaches in public and say the coverage scheme was due to having such terrible Assistant Coaches due to getting poached after the Super Bowl. He is just not that type of guy and I respect him for it.
We will have to agree to disagree.