Angry Ram
Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2010
- Messages
- 18,000
Who's talking about replacing him? It's not hard to get here really. The common theme is how much better this team would be if he didn't throw pick 6's and if he didn't put us in a hole early in games. Nobody is talking about replacing him! We're wanting him and the team to be better. A couple of those bad games without his mistakes we win and we're 15-2 or 16-1. I guess 12-4 is ok but last I checked with better QB play 16-1 is a lot better.Matt was 14 for 14 in the second half yesterday and had a game winning drive and TD pass completing two 4th down passing plays on that drive. The Rams are 12 and 4 and just won two back to back road games to clinch a playoff spot and have won 5 straight. Who would the anti Stafford folks replace him with?.
One of those bad games without mistakes and they're the number one seed...Who's talking about replacing him? It's not hard to get here really. The common theme is how much better this team would be if he didn't throw pick 6's and if he didn't put us in a hole early in games. Nobody is talking about replacing him! We're wanting him and the team to be better. A couple of those bad games without his mistakes we win and we're 15-2 or 16-1. I guess 12-4 is ok but last I checked with better QB play 16-1 is a lot better.
Yes we beat the Packers and we're in the drivers seat. Instead the road to the Super Bowl goes thru Green Bay and a QB who's thrown 4 ints in over 500 attempts.One of those bad games without mistakes and they're the number one seed...
I thought we were talking on this message board. Please tell me what you'd like to talk about?Care to actually talk @OldSchool
Oh we did for Goff as well. I did anyway. Seem to remember others as well. The fact is not all interceptions are the QBs fault. Either are strip sacks. Sometimes the D just makes a good play.Really? However, I will say that I don't seem to recall explaining so many int's away as we do now.
I thought we were talking on this message board. Please tell me what you'd like to talk about?
Dilfer made some good comments on Stafford and the Rams on Cowherd.of course its fair to scrutinize turnovers... just saying we won a lot int he past with QBs that turned the ball over.
I think Brady has one like 7 or 8 playoff games with 2-3 ints.
I don't want Stafford turning it over but I also don't want him to play conservative.
Thats the way Warner was - he was aggressive.
Oh got it assuming that everybody who is critical of Matt Stafford's mistakes are just salty because he's a Rams player now is designed to illicit intelligent conversation? When you want to stop with these kind of comments I'd be more than happy to have a serious conversation.I'd appreciate a response instead of sarcastic hahas to my posts when I'm not trying to make a funny.
I am not sure there are Anti-Staffords on here.Matt was 14 for 14 in the second half yesterday and had a game winning drive and TD pass completing two 4th down passing plays on that drive. The Rams are 12 and 4 and just won two back to back road games to clinch a playoff spot and have won 5 straight. Who would the anti Stafford folks replace him with?.
I keep wondering that too. I know when I hurt my back a little when I was playing golf on vacation, it would take me a swing or two on each hole to get loose.Anybody else think he is still having back issues, hence the throws in the 1st Quarter of every game that are behind receivers? Seems like it is taking extra long for him to get warmed up and to his normal accuracy. One thing about Stafford, he will never use it as an excuse, in fact he will say he is 100% No matter what. He hasn't had that issue in the past, and I think at the end of the year, we are going to find out that his back was much worse than he was letting on.
I didn't say anyone was speaking of replacing him but I do feel some fans (not necessarily here) think he is to blame for the 4 losses. I don't see anyone better who is or was available. I think he has played great all season. The Rams ran into a juggernaut in the first AZ game. The other 3 losses came when Woods went down and new players were added and the 0-line was make shift due to illness or injury. If Woods were still on the field half of Staffords picks would never of happened. Its really hard to lose a guy like Woods who does so much and always seems to be open in the clutch.Who's talking about replacing him? It's not hard to get here really. The common theme is how much better this team would be if he didn't throw pick 6's and if he didn't put us in a hole early in games. Nobody is talking about replacing him! We're wanting him and the team to be better. A couple of those bad games without his mistakes we win and we're 15-2 or 16-1. I guess 12-4 is ok but last I checked with better QB play 16-1 is a lot better.
The AZ loss was a team loss.I didn't say anyone was speaking of replacing him but I do feel some fans (not necessarily here) think he is to blame for the 4 losses. I don't see anyone better who is or was available. I think he has played great all season. The Rams ran into a juggernaut in the first AZ game. The other 3 losses came when Woods went down and new players were added and the 0-line was make shift due to illness or injury. If Woods were still on the field half of Staffords picks would never of happened. Its really hard to lose a guy like Woods who does so much and always seems to be open in the clutch.
4th quarter in a close game I want Stafford under center. I'm happy with that.