Jacobarch
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 5,782
- Name
- Jake
Id argue this not social media. This is a forum.Umm... I’m not sure how to say this, but... DUDE, here on ROD you’re sorta on “social media...the toilet of the internet!”:eek:
Id argue this not social media. This is a forum.Umm... I’m not sure how to say this, but... DUDE, here on ROD you’re sorta on “social media...the toilet of the internet!”:eek:
And he also went 12/23 for 127 yards, 2 int and a 46.8 qb rating against Buffalo
That’s the thing with Bortles, one week he’s a Porsche, the next 2 weeks he’s a Hyundai
I think it is a good move by the Rams! I hope they will sign him soon before some other team gives him a better offer!
Kudos to Rams for looking under every stone.
I like Bortles, he's big, has a good arm and can run.... @jrry32 had the Ram signing Bortles in his off season mock and seems like the right fit. Because he's still being paid by the Jags, the Rams should not have to pay him that much and @Selassie I can brag about the institution he attended as well.
![]()
It’s easy to see potential big upside for both Bortles and the Rams here if they can come to an agreement.
Kudos to Rams for looking under every stone.
I don't know why anyone would want a QB who has mostly played crappy football.
Is he better than Mannion? Who knows, we really don't even know exactly what Mannion is, or how well he would play. He's played so little.
I trust the coaches on this. If they think he's competent as a back up that suits me.
Makes great sense for the Rams, but it seems a little puzzling to me from Bortles' perspective. Is his only market option now as a backup? -- in which case the Rams are a really good choice.
Otherwise don't see how he can count on getting playing time and chance to improve his market value. Seemed to me looking at Bortles from a distance that he showed some potential but either was not consistent with technique or reads, or was just not coached or used correctly (as happened to Foles with the Rams). Bortles might well improve under our coaching and with our O if given the chance, but can't if he doesn't play much.
Kirk Cousins played mostly crappy football before McVay became his OC. Yes, he's better than Mannion.
Well we can't make that call we don't see him in practice.
And paying that much money to a backup is out of whack!
The difference between social media and a forum is relatively small. A forum is actually a type of social media, the only difference being is that a forum is narrowed down by subject. By doing this it leads to those who have knowledge of the chosen subject becoming members of the forum.Id argue this not social media. This is a forum.
Well, Bortles went 29/45 for 376 yards with 4 td's and one pick against the Pats last year.
With quailty OL play, the guy has proven he can produce at a high level.
I'd be surprised if he settles for a backup role with the Rams.
Makes great sense for the Rams, but it seems a little puzzling to me from Bortles' perspective. Is his only market option now as a backup? -- in which case the Rams are a really good choice.
Otherwise don't see how he can count on getting playing time and chance to improve his market value. Seemed to me looking at Bortles from a distance that he showed some potential but either was not consistent with technique or reads, or was just not coached or used correctly (as happened to Foles with the Rams). Bortles might well improve under our coaching and with our O if given the chance, but can't if he doesn't play much.
I've seen Mannion play in games. I can make that call. Bortles is better. And I'd love to see what McVay can do with him. He's been a competent starter when things were good around him in Jax. To this point in his career, he's simply been a guy who can't rise above his circumstances. When things are bad, he's bad.