Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 22,983
Coming from CMU, maybe there was an adjustment periodHe's interesting. When I was watching DL as a group early in the offseason, kind of going through them fast my first pass through with a game each, whatever game I watched of his was not particularly impressive. Can't recall which game it was but he did get blown off the ball a time or two and didn't look all that great.
Then a month or two later I went through the guys listed higher and whatever game I watched looked pretty damn good. Was probably Louisville. Can't recall but then I looked at his reps in the Senior Bowl and knew he'd be on our radar.
So idk what his deal was or if maybe I was watching an older tape of him. It is certainly possible. But I don't think motor is an issue for him and he's got good quickness and athleticism so I really have no worries on him. In fact I suspect he's going to be a beast for us.
Kancey was a top ten DLineman last seasonSuh 33 1/2
Donald 32 5/8
Others found:
Adrian Hutchinson 32 1/8
Ed Oliver 31 ¾
Kobie Turner 31 3/8
Greg Gaines 31 ¼
Braden Fiske 31
Calijah Kancey 30 5/8
The entire basis for people criticizing that trade is based on average success rate, being 42%. What they ignore is that the Rams felt like Fiske was a first round talent, in which case, that trade makes perfect sense. If Fiske plays like a top ten pick the. The trade was well worth it.NFL executives gave their thoughts on the Rams trade for Braden Fiske
The Athletic’s Mike Sando shared what NFL executives had to say about the Rams trade for Braden Fiskewww.turfshowtimes.com
NFL executives gave their thoughts on the Rams trade for Braden Fiske
The Athletic’s Mike Sando shared what NFL executives had to say about the Rams trade for Braden Fiske
By Blaine Grisak@bgrisakTST May 4, 2024, 12:55pm CDT
4 Comments / 5 New
If you buy something from an SB Nation link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.
Share this story
- Share this on Facebook (opens in new window)
- Share this on Twitter (opens in new window)
- SHAREAll sharing options
Photo by Don Juan Moore/Getty Images
One of the more controversial moves of the NFL Draft last week seems to be what the Los Angeles Rams traded away to move up and get Florida State defensive tackle Braden Fiske. In the trade, the Rams gave up a 2025 2nd round pick to move up 13 spots with the Carolina Panthers to acquire Fiske.
The Athletic’s Mike Sando asked NFL Executives around the league of their thoughts on each team’s draft class. Executives specifically brought up the move that the Rams made to go up and get Fiske. Said one executive,
According to Sando, “Execs saw that as behavior consistent with having a strong head coach. They also cited reports suggesting the Rams explored trading into the top 10 for tight end Brock Bowers (or possibly Byron Murphy II).”
The move to go up and get Fiske was a bold one. It was the most expensive Day 2 overpay of the last six drafts. With that said, he was very clearly a player that the Rams liked and felt would be a good addition to their defensive rotation. Until Fiske gets the field, there will be questions on whether or not the move up was worth it.
As Bill Barnwell noted this week,
Whether or not the trade up was worth it will only be determined by how Fiske performs on the field. The Detroit Lions traded away a 2025 third round for a project offensive tackle from British Columbia with a rugby background. Meanwhile, the Rams invested in a second-team All-ACC defensive tackle which is overshadowing a potential poor investment or trade up move from Brad Holmes and the Lions.
The Rams obviously liked Fiske enough to move up for him and trade away future assets. However, NFL executives and analysts around the league continue to question whether or not it was the right move.
I trust Snead on this one. I’m sure Giff gave his stamp of approval.