- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,262
- Name
- Dennis
Sorry tried to paste, but just puts up generic YouTube link, YouTube must be going stupid in restrictions. Its on Herd today interview with Whit.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz6A9VR47cg
Sorry tried to paste, but just puts up generic YouTube link, YouTube must be going stupid in restrictions. Its on Herd today interview with Whit.
I think you people are fucking crazy.
I love and support Goff, I just have the perspective that he's been a bottom third QB this year. The reasons for his struggles are not all on him, however right now in the playoffs McVay has to ensure he's got the best mix of guys on the field and that best mix might not include Jared Goff.
Whether you can handle that as a fan, well, that's up to you.
Where some posters are right now, judging from what I am reading, is that Wolford isn't worthy of putting Goff on the bench. But I think those of you who hold that opinion are wrong. And I think Wolford if he plays will probably prove you wrong.
How could I be so confident of this? McVay. He knows this system can be inclusive of weak armed QBs. He has seen Wolford making quick decisions and reading fast in practice all season long. We have an emerging run game to complement a system QB and the OL is getting healthy at the right time.
McVay has done this before with Cousins who is another shitty armed QB. So for me I'm going to treat this like I would ANY OTHER POSITION and root for the guy who gets the nod. If it's Goff, I am confident he'll rebound in his play. If it's Wolford, I am confident he'll run the gameplan efficiently. It's really that simple dudes. IMO.
Cousins was also a guy nobody thought could play starting QB. He was an afterthought that rose to a starting job because of McVay's ability to shape a scheme and play to his strengths.Wolford is worthy of putting Goff on the bench. Wolford is not worth of putting healthy Goff on the bench. As far as your Cousins example is concerned, the issue with that comparison is that Cousins was the Goff in this scenario, not the Wolford. He was the guy who proved he could execute McVay's scheme at a fairly high level. Colt McCoy would probably be a more apt comparison for Wolford. Frankly, McCoy looked competent when they needed him to play in 2014 and 2015. So yeah, if Cousins's ability to throw was hampered by injury, I could see McCoy being the better option in those years.
Cousins was also a guy nobody thought could play starting QB. He was an afterthought that rose to a starting job because of McVay's ability to shape a scheme and play to his strengths.
By that same token McVay is going to do that with Wolford. Wolford's strength is his quickness of mind and reads. With him running the system the ball will mostly get dealt to the right player for a given read, and we'll get some extra first downs and sustained drives with his mobility. That's all this is about IMO.
Before I saw Wolford vs the Cards I didn't think much of him. But now I believe I am seeing what McVay is trying to do and if Wolford can get it done we have a chance to beat Green Bay and then see if we can get Goff back for that NFC title game.
I mean cousins was also selected in the 4th round that year for a reason. Washington surely wanted insurance thought highly enough of cousins to select him 102 overall.Cousins was also a guy nobody thought could play starting QB. He was an afterthought that rose to a starting job because of McVay's ability to shape a scheme and play to his strengths.
By that same token McVay is going to do that with Wolford. Wolford's strength is his quickness of mind and reads. With him running the system the ball will mostly get dealt to the right player for a given read, and we'll get some extra first downs and sustained drives with his mobility. That's all this is about IMO.
Before I saw Wolford vs the Cards I didn't think much of him. But now I believe I am seeing what McVay is trying to do and if Wolford can get it done we have a chance to beat Green Bay and then see if we can get Goff back for that NFC title game.
I think everyone wants the 2018 Goff back running our offense. It's the best case scenario for the Rams too, seeing as how they invested in him. If he doesn't rebound we're in deep shit and will require a McVay QB miracle to overcome it. So I am with you there man.That being said I agree with you. I think we can win in GB led by this defense with wolford as our qb doing just enough. I really just want a healthy Goff back as I mentioned I think a Goff bounceback is much more probable than Wolford succeeding. Though, it would be a hell of a story.
NFC Championship game against the #1 seed, on the road in front of 70,000 fans and who had beaten the Rams earlier in that season, is just not comparable in any way, shape or form.My whole point was that they've played comparable games that Goff has been praised for and I stand by that.
Nah, Cousins star shined early on when he replaced an injured RGIII and threw the game tying TD against the Ravens, then won in OT. Then the next week in his first start, he shredded the Browns on the road and helped put the Redskins on track for the playoffs. There was plenty of talk about whether they shouldnt be rushing RGIII back, as they could win with Cousins. That was Shanahan the OC, McVay was TE coach or somethingCousins was also a guy nobody thought could play starting QB. He was an afterthought that rose to a starting job because of McVay's ability to shape a scheme and play to his strengths.
So inside information huh Why would Colin Blowhard have inside information?
Well shit. There goes my old memory again.Nah, Cousins star shined early on when he replaced an injured RGIII and threw the game tying TD against the Ravens, then won in OT. Then the next week in his first start, he shredded the Browns on the road and helped put the Redskins on track for the playoffs. There was plenty of talk about whether they shouldnt be rushing RGIII back, as they could win with Cousins. That was Shanahan the OC, McVay was TE coach or something