Petition to Replace Vinovitch with a Different Ref

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RhodyRams

well hung member
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
11,790
No, this kind of thing is more about spreading a message and getting a wide audience talking about a specific subject. Going viral if you will. If it becomes a mainstream storyline, the NFL might feel a bit of pressure to change it.

But thanks for publicly invalidating the entire petition by faking signatures.


Oh don't you worry, I am an excellent forger, can't tell my signature from theirs. (y)



BTW..... for some reason blue font doesn't work on my phone
 
Last edited:

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
I disagree Les.....Vinobitch frequently loses control of the game and they become chippy, but only one team ever seems to pay the price....why? You think Steve Smith wasn't an instigator? You think the lack of holding calls against AD didn't finally send him over the edge? I don't expect anything to come of this but to have people aware...when/if something strange goes down Sunday, don't be surprised.....we won't be.

The Rams under Fisher were the chippiest team in the NFL. That's why so many penalties. The rep was well earned and sometimes they played a little past the edge.

I've talked about holding calls all tyear. It's not just Donald, it's every defender in the NFL. They need at least one other guy back there because one guy can't keep his eyes on 10 -12 people. The guys playing OL have figured out how and when they can get away with it and they do. The NFL as far as I am concerned HAS to put an extra person in the backfield and start calling holding until it stops.

Every method of fudging in every sport gets used by players, I get that. But helmet to helmet hits, horse collar tackles, chop blocks, contact past 5 yards and so on all got the players to change and adjust. Calling the penalties because there is an extra set of eyes back there will stop it from happening as much.

If you go look at any NFL teams message boards EVERYONE is complaining about it because it's a league wide issue.
 

jacktheripper85

Starter
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
958
The Rams under Fisher were the chippiest team in the NFL. That's why so many penalties. The rep was well earned and sometimes they played a little past the edge.

I've talked about holding calls all tyear. It's not just Donald, it's every defender in the NFL. They need at least one other guy back there because one guy can't keep his eyes on 10 -12 people. The guys playing OL have figured out how and when they can get away with it and they do. The NFL as far as I am concerned HAS to put an extra person in the backfield and start calling holding until it stops.

Every method of fudging in every sport gets used by players, I get that. But helmet to helmet hits, horse collar tackles, chop blocks, contact past 5 yards and so on all got the players to change and adjust. Calling the penalties because there is an extra set of eyes back there will stop it from happening as much.

If you go look at any NFL teams message boards EVERYONE is complaining about it because it's a league wide issue.

I hear what you are saying but you talk about needing another ref. I see this holding crap going on right in front of the ref and he won’t throw the flag. Do we need another ref or just need the one who’s supposed to be watching the line throw the flag?
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
I hear what you are saying but you talk about needing another ref. I see this holding crap going on right in front of the ref and he won’t throw the flag. Do we need another ref or just need the one who’s supposed to be watching the line throw the flag?

If you look at how the refs are positioned it makes it clear that another person is needed. There is no way one guy can watch everything, and especially on the left side of the OL. Often what we see are closeups and angles, and if you watch replays look at how often the R has his view obscured. It happens an AWFUL lot.

Imagine if only two guys were watching the entire secondary..........the OPI and DPI we would see would drive us crazy just like the holding is.

They have to fix this, and it isn't even hard.




images
 

Stump23

Rookie
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
215
If you look at how the refs are positioned it makes it clear that another person is needed. There is no way one guy can watch everything, and especially on the left side of the OL. Often what we see are closeups and angles, and if you watch replays look at how often the R has his view obscured. It happens an AWFUL lot.

Imagine if only two guys were watching the entire secondary..........the OPI and DPI we would see would drive us crazy just like the holding is.

They have to fix this, and it isn't even hard.




images
The Umpire now lines up behind the line of scrimmage opposite the Referee most of the game, probably to do just that. Also, Umpires were getting beat up with crossing routes and generally getting in the way of traffic between LB's, WR's and the football
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
EVERYONE is complaining about it because it's a league wide issue.

Then why are you in this thread repeatedly complaining about the rest of us pointing out ref bias and incompetence? Maybe the next petition should go directly to Goodell and the rest of the boobs in charge of the referees.

We now have some that have been hired full-time. We have multiple cameras everywhere. Instant replays looked at by supposed experts in New York, yet the screwups continue game after game. Some of the calls and non-calls are jaw-droppingly ridiculous.

Players train their bodies year round and undergo injuries and great pain and coaches spend huge amounts of hours to have their team be the best they can be. But one fat-ass on the field wearing zebra stripes can undo everything with one bad call.

It's no wonder every fan base gets bent out of shape and complains.
 

HX76

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
3,021
"And I mean zero disrespect"

None taken old bean.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Then why are you in this thread repeatedly complaining about the rest of us pointing out ref bias and incompetence?

Incompetence and bias are two completely different things.

The gist is the Vinovich is "out to get the Rams" essentially.

And I only addressed the holding issue in that post.

Other things, like he is the only person to toss Long and Donald are simply anecdotal nonsensical stuff.

The Rams, if you look at the graphs I posted, had tons of calls go against them by a few refs.

This shouldn't shock anyone. The coaching staff had Williams for a bit and Fisher for almost 5 years.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,798
Interesting takes by the Saints fans.

You gotta laugh at a fanbase criticizing us for being distrustful of the refs while they whine about how persecuted their team is lol.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,880
No, the Saints screwjob was because they gave us a terrible spot (which is 100% his fault). And those things rarely get overturned because they make some weak excuse about the angles. Further, when you look at the calls and non-calls, it's even worse. Here are our penalties:
1. Marcus Peters - Defensive Holding (Declined)
2. Marcus Peters - Pass Interference
3. Ndamukong Suh - Offsides
4. Aaron Donald - Unnecessary Roughness
5. Rodger Saffold - Unnecessary Roughness

Here were theirs:
1. Eli Apple - Defensive Holding
2. Michael Thomas - Unsportsmanlike Conduct (for his celebration with the cell phone)

Basically, the Saints had 1 penalty for 5 yards when it actually mattered. And they played our DBs a lot tighter than NO's.


On the Saffold Unsportsmanlike penalty, he shoved a Saint and the flag flew then he was blindsided by another Saint who had a running start and was knocked down. No flag for retaliation from a third party. Those penalties should offset.

The Saints were driving toward the goal with .33 left at they half. They were running out of time to tack on another 7. That penalty was half the distance to the goal and a first down. Lame.



At 8:01 in the third period Mike Thomas extends a drive after a very obvious push off of Peters. No flag. It was much worse that Peters Pass Interference, where he basically laid his hands on the receiver without grabbing or redirecting while trying to make a play on the ball.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
The coaching staff had Williams for a bit and Fisher for almost 5 years.

So what? Are refs calling penalties based on reputation now? How about calling a game fair and square for both teams based solely on what happens on the field.
 

1maGoh

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
3,957
So what? Are refs calling penalties based on reputation now? How about calling a game fair and square for both teams based solely on what happens on the field.
There was an article about how much prep the refs have to do just to be as terrible as they are. In it they (one of the refs) mentioned that during the week leading up to a game they take time to learn what players tend to commit which fouls so they know where to look first the game. Which sounds a lot like confirmation bias in progress. They think player A commits a lot of holding, so they look for player A to commit holding, they see something they maybe was holding but they aren't sure, then they call player A for holding because they know he does it a lot.

What happens in a game is secondary to what the ref thinks is going to happen. Given the speed of the game and the fact that they are in possibly the worst position imaginable to determine penalties or assess anything correctly, it's not surprising that they have biases that bleed through. That and they're human. Except Vinovitch. He's clearly a soul sucking demon.
 

SteezyEndo

The Immaculate Exception
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
7,109
Refs now days just seem to get in the way of things. Probably don’t really pay attention. Just thinking about where to grub when this game is over kind of :poop:... Quite frankly with technology now days you can remove the field personnel and just have Dean Blandino on the sky cam...
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
they take time to learn what players tend to commit which fouls so they know where to look first the game.

Then how to explain Aaron Donald being held on most plays with rarely any penalties being called on opposing O-linemen? Surely these refs must be aware of that.

What bothers me the most about this is that penalties aren't being called fairly. The latest example is Marcus Peters being penalized(which he should have been) but Amari Cooper not being called even though he took a swing at Peters right in front of the refs. That should have been offsetting penalties.
Peters was the instigator but Cooper could have walked away.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I520XXB7Y3Y

Instant replay should be used on 15-yard penalties and especially on DPI where a team can gain tons of yardage because of a penalty. And yes, I'm willing for the game to be even longer than it is now as long as the refs get it right. The networks would be happy about that because they can show even more commercials. :sneaky: