Mackeyser
Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2013
- Messages
- 14,536
- Name
- Mack
Honestly it's just a progression of the game, it was the same when X player was the first 10 million dollar player, so on and so forth until today. If we want to play in the best of the best player on our team game they have to be paid like #1 and that's just a reality. Which is why I still don't get Rams fans infatuation with OBJ, mathematically it doesn't work and he's not willing to work with us whatsoever. Donald's contract won't hamper us in the future and obviously any money will have to be differed for the remainder of the contract. Both sides just need to come to an agreement.
You don't win championships with a #1 offense, we need to keep together and complete our team which we are doing with the D and if we want to keep the best defensive player in the league he's going to be the highest paid ever. Next year that will change when someone gets more money and so on and so forth. I'm just ready to set the boundaries sign him and move on.
My point was it was possible to have OBJ come to the Rams with some creativity.
If AD is gonna be above Mack who I think will get around $21/yr, then it's just not going to happen.
I think any wiggle room is lost at that price for AD.
Which is a shame because with as much as AD wants to win, his contract will ultimately be an impediment just like Suh's was. Even if we don't pay Gurley and only pay Goff and maybe Peters, presuming he works out, we're still going to have issues.
Don't get me wrong, I think we're going to be able to compete with anyone. That said, the deep threat on offense is pretty important for spacing.
Thus the idea of having a transcendent talent on the outside was beyond intriguing.
It might have worked.
Now? I can't see any way it does and that feeling I had has really dissipated.