Mackeyser
Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2013
- Messages
- 14,539
- Name
- Mack
Another idle question for all— any guesses as to how teams work around the “no tampering” rules?
Suppose, as a recruiting tool, McVay wants OBJ to know how he would be used in the Rams’ offense. What’s to prevent McVay from telling this info to a player who is a “friend of a friend” of OBJ, who then passes it on to OBJ himself?
Just wonder if these “no communication” rules are strictly enforced— or routinely bent or broken.
I bet if McVay or Snead want to communicate a specific message of some sort to OBJ, they could do so through a third party somehow.
They don't need to do that although it's been done in the past that way.
All they need to do is use "hypothetically" before every sentence (or say they did) and they can avoid most tampering issues.
Honestly, they need to change it because as of right now, it's not possible for teams to logistically make smart trades without tampering.
It's like holding. If they called it every time it happened, they'd never get an offensive play off. So, instead we get this...thing where OL hold on every play and hope that they don't get called.
If teams were punished every time there was tampering, there'd be lots of draft picks seized and teams would be forced to make huge leaps of faith and some trades would just look idiotic in retrospect.
Just like with holding, they should fix it so that everyone is playing within the rules, but... they won't.