- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #21
I hope it is one of those full size ones with the extra big buttons for the visually impaired.
Sounds like you're rooting for a losing season for the Rams. You negative nelly.
I hope it is one of those full size ones with the extra big buttons for the visually impaired.
While I agree with what you say here, jrry, I believe what the team will think depends on Bradford's performance and health. Sure, they believe in him right now, but it is possible that Bradford will disappoint and lose their faith.
And quite frankly, if the Rams have a winning season and Bradford plays well, I couldn't care less about any negative Bradford arguments. I don't worry about closed minded people.
If he picks up where he left off ,it is.When I hear knowledgeable football guys like Martz say Bradford has developed bad habits, then I cannot believe his game is there. Martz loves Bradford and believes he will be just fine with a better supporting cast, but Bradford's game is NOT THERE yet.
The Rams were in middle of the league in dropped passes. Denver had the most drops.What about the ones that the receivers drop?...oh incompletes not incompletions.
The Rams were in middle of the league in dropped passes. Denver had the most drops.
As far as Sam Bradford succeeding, I think it's more a Brian Schottenheimer thing. You can have a great actors, a solid director, but without a good script you will make a crappy movie. I don't think 2014 is Bradford's make or break year. Barring Bradford stinks it up or gets injured, I think 2014 is Brian Schottenheimer's make or break year.
According to which source? The only one I've seen we were third most and first when Sam went down.
I'll have to get back to ya on that. I remembered the stats from my article on Pass Differential. I remember if figured out what Sam Bradford's YDS/A would have been if the Rams led the league with the fewest drops. And it increased his YDA/A by .4 yards per pass. What's your source?
What happens if the two do not necessarily go hand in hand this year? Lets say Bradford plays lights out and puts up ridiculous numbers and the team still doesnt win. What then?
I don't discount a lot of things when looking at Bradford. I think they all have a hand in how things have become what they are. To be clear, I am not on the "Bradford" train, but I still want to see the train get where it needs to go.
All of these things contribute to the situation we find Sam in now:
Team injuries
Lower team offensive talent level - more defense drafted then offense
Bad offensive line
Injuries to Sam
Multiple coordinators and offensive game plans
His rookie contract
The changes in the League
The changes in the NFC West, (remember it was the league worst back when he was drafted)
I may not be a big Sam supporter, but I can easily see him having a Pro Bowl year if he and the offensive line stay healthy.
That is why stats don't always tell the true story. Rodgers is notorious for holding onto the ball to try to make a big play. They have also had a lot of OL injuries the last two seasons. Big Ben is another example of holding onto the ball. Sam has improved on getting rid of the ball, and not taking sacks, but that doesn't in any sense mean that the Rams OL was better than a lot of teams.Just for fun, here's an interesting stat.
Aaron Rodgers has been sacked a total of 139 times over the past 4 years. Bradford has been sacked 120 times over that same time period.
I agree that injured again would be a concern, although I would still argue against the "injury prone" stance, but what has he done to make anyone believe he will be "mediocre or worse"?If Bradford plays lights out and puts up ridiculous numbers and the team has another losing season, then I'll give you all my ROD money and eat my keyboard.
Infinitely more likely is if they have another losing season, then Bradford is either mediocre or worse or hurt again.
Doesn't actually provide an accurate comparison out of context. The Broncos attempted 659 passes, the Rams 504.The Rams were in middle of the league in dropped passes. Denver had the most drops.
As far as Sam Bradford succeeding, I think it's more a Brian Schottenheimer thing. You can have a great actors, a solid director, but without a good script you will make a crappy movie. I don't think 2014 is Bradford's make or break year. Barring Bradford stinks it up or gets injured, I think 2014 is Brian Schottenheimer's make or break year.
Here's another interesting stat. Just for fun.Just for fun, here's an interesting stat.
Aaron Rodgers has been sacked a total of 139 times over the past 4 years. Bradford has been sacked 120 times over that same time period.
Not trying to "call anyone out" here but I just don't understand this position. I mean, what's not to like about the guy? You've already described a less than ideal environment since his arrival. Do you care to explain?I don't discount a lot of things when looking at Bradford. I think they all have a hand in how things have become what they are. To be clear, I am not on the "Bradford" train, but I still want to see the train get where it needs to go.
All of these things contribute to the situation we find Sam in now:
Team injuries
Lower team offensive talent level - more defense drafted then offense
Bad offensive line
Injuries to Sam
Multiple coordinators and offensive game plans
His rookie contract
The changes in the League
The changes in the NFC West, (remember it was the league worst back when he was drafted)
I may not be a big Sam supporter, but I can easily see him having a Pro Bowl year if he and the offensive line stay healthy.