Mackeyser
Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2013
- Messages
- 14,519
- Name
- Mack
You have to know how PFF grades.
D,W grades out better than Jalen because he's targeted more. If the ball isn't thrown Jalens way, there's no grade.
I agree Big Time with PFF, Whit is Much Better than Note and imho It's not even debatable, just me.
Also they grade A.D at the top again and again.
Is PFF the end, all answers, No but I do believe there's like 26 or so NFL teams that use their stats last I knew.
Sure, and if they use it as one of many tools, then fine.
However, it's far too easy for pros and fans alike to look at amalgamated "scores" like that given out by PFF and think that they're comprehensive and they're just not.
Moreover, in determining if a player should be acquired, PFF ratings are HORRIBLE and teams who use them deserve all the problems that come with that.
PFF doesn't ascertain or evaluate scheme fit, assignment integrity, locker room fit, character or any of a zillion other variables that are important when it comes to going beyond surface evaluations.
Is Whit better than Noteboom? Of course. The eyeball test solves that riddle.
and DW grading out higher than Ramsey when Ramsey erased one of the most prolific WRs in the game is part of why I say the metric is really for way oversimplifying things for television audiences and is pretty worthless beyond that.
If any pro teams actually use a metric in which the components are created by people without any actual applied knowledge in playing and/or coaching football, then they are the poorer for it.