WestCoastRam
Legend
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 6,557
I don't know, I just read it as McVay just being transparent, "Hey, we have a number that we'd like to have you back on, the teams young and we need to think about the future and I know you've got a good year or two left in you, I'm worried that our timelines don't match up, go check out some other teams, see what's out there, let us know. Let's talk again in 3 weeks. I want to work something out with you but I don't know if we can."McVay also kept emphasizing how that communication can help lessen the blow if things don't workout. I pointed the Goff part out because McVay obviously regrets showing his appreciation to the player and human being Goff was during his time as a Ram prior to trading him. To me, it sure seems like he's doing that for Stafford now. I know it's a painful realization, myself included, for a lot of folks here to even consider there is a strong possibility Stafford is gone but it most definitely is. Unfortunately this is the shitty business side of the NFL which both McVay and Stafford seem to understand. McVay ultimately is saying these decisions are not personal and don't speak to the value to a player as a special human being.
I think it's 50/50 he's gone. I just don't see it as being a foregone conclusion nor ignoring a painful realization since I'm starting to get stars in my eyes over draft picks and taking our lumps this year to get a QB in next years draft.
The fact of the matter is: if we matched Stafford's number he'd be a Ram. If Stafford matched out number, he'd be a Ram. If we can't meet somewhere in between he's gone. In 2 out of 3 of these scenarios, he's a Ram.