The head jerk is the same thing Rodgers does with his hands to get defenders to jump offsides. As Mannion does intend to get a lot more encroachments and offsides calls then Goff.
The problem is that Mannion only seems to do it when he's in the shotgun and the ball is actually being snapped, that makes it a tell. There's nothing to suggest that Mannion or Goff are better at drawing people offside than the other, I don't know why you'd say that Mannion is better at it. Neither of them have enough time (especially Mannion) to have displayed that ability.
Highlighting flaws is saying he has a slow release or saying that he locks onto his receivers, or he is slow in his back pedal those are flaws, saying things like it was a good throw but if he throw it to the shoulder he could have got a extra yard that's not pointing out a flaw.
Ball placement is a flaw as well, albeit of a different nature. That's a flaw with the arm, or the release, if it's coachable or not is another thing. For Mannion's sake we better hope it's coachable, otherwise he'll never get a shot at being a long term starter. For what it's worth he, and others have highlighted that Mannion has a bad habit of locking onto receivers as well.
And i have seen every qb leave their receiver out to dry that's why there are defenseless receiver rules in the game and as a qb and receiver they both were in the zone on that play.
It happens sometimes, that's part of the game, but when it's happening a lot, especially when there are better options on the field then the QB needs to be making better decisions. I'll be honest, I've seen more plays where Mannion has left receivers out to dry this preseason than I've ever seen from Goff. Now take that with a grain of salt, because I haven't sat down and studied his college tape, but it looks to be a problem, our receivers can't help us if none of them can remember their own names.
In regards to misses being good throws there are. Like overthrowing a deep pass instead of underthrowing where it gets intercepted or like Goff last year throwing them out of bounds and not giving your receiver a chance.
A bad throw is a bad throw. If a throw is 10 yards in front of a receiver then it doesn't matter if it's in bounds or not. You can make a smart decision on a bad throw, such as keeping it in bounds or even just slightly out of bounds so it's either your receiver or not, but it's still a bad throw. The decision making process and the art of actually physically throwing the football should be judged independently. They're both fixed differently. You can have a great throw with a bad decision (Mannion's game winning TD in the Raiders game is actually a good example of this, and it worked out great for us too for an added bonus) and a bad throw with a good decision (Goff's interception against the Chargers). Independent actions.
I'm not saying Mannion is a finished product but at the same time I'm not trying to be a guy who analyzes plays if that's what he wanna do on twitter then he needs to do it objectively otherwise you come across as a troll and someone that's calling themselves a Rams fan but saying things like that should have been a fumble Mannion got a way with one.
Neither of them are finished products obviously, but Goff is now further along in development than Mannion is. Goff had flaws in his game, but they weren't as difficult to fix as Mannion's are. Those flaws added with the struggle with the mental aspect of it (and just the general Fisher/Borasness of the playbook) really made Goff struggle last year. However Goff has been able to tweak and fix/improve a lot of his physical flaws as well as adjust to the mental aspect of the game. Mannion looks to be about the same past two years. That doesn't mean that Mannion is a bad QB, I don't think he is, and if he needed to step in and be the starter I'm comfortable with that. However, unless I see major strides from Mannion I'm not comfortable with him as a long term answer. Without major improvements from Goff this year I would have said the same thing. Now I give both of them a little benefit of the doubt because it's a new system, but I wanted to see that step up, and I see that with Goff, less so with Mannion. That suggests Mannion is pretty much to the point where he is what he is, and that's fine, he's still pretty good. I'd wager he's better than a lot of the other backups, and a QB desperate team (like the 49ers or the Jags) would possibly give him a look if he was on their roster at some point in the season. Goff still has room to grow, we can see the jump from year 1 to 2, hopefully we see another from 2 to 3... When you stop seeing those jumps, then your QB is probably about where he's going to be.
For what it's worth, I wanted Mannion to start at least a game or two his rookie year.
That pass from Goff to Watkins was the BEST deep throw Goff made and I acknowledged that even though the pass was dropped I gave Goff his props like I always do. The difference is I don't say well that was a bad pass but he got bailed out, because I know that every pass isn't going to be where they want it every pass isn't going to come out the way they want it. I didn't criticize Goff on that interception because crap happens. I said last year I don't care about Goff throwing picks because it's go happen.
If Mannion throws a good ball, I'll point to it, I think he's thrown some good ones, I think Mannion has a decent arm, I just think Goff has a better one. Doesn't mean that Mannion is bad, his arm is among the least of my concerns.
But what works me up is when guys like that don't point out all of his precision passes the one deep down the field to Reynolds that he dropped or against the Raiders completing all those third down passes or how he has been blitzed more and hit more but still only been sacked 2x.
I agree, if you're going to judge a player you need to point out the good and the bad. That's why I try to spend less time talking about Mannion details than I do Goff details, because I spent/spend more time breaking down the Goff plays and looking at things he's doing well and things he's struggling with. For example, I'm actually quite worried about Goff's tendency to not throw a good spiral. I don't want one every time, but there are two very clear examples that I can think about this training camp where he just threw this ugly wobbly thing. Once in that Chargers game and another in practice with fade routes (when we first grabbed Watkins), it was hard to tell exactly who the QB throwing was, but I'm pretty sure it was Goff and I did not like how the ball wobbled. I don't know what exactly is causing that to happen every so often, but I really hope it gets better as he grows. I think it will, but I'd be lying if I pretended like it wasn't there or that I was okay with it.
I do look at things objectively that how I'm able to give Goff his props when he make plays and how I'm able to withhold criticism when he doesn't do well
I think there's a bit of a difference between dissecting a play and finding the good and bad in each one, and then talking about that, which is what I try to do most of the time, and looking at the overall play and judging it largely based off the result. To be clear I'm not saying this is what you do, since that's a bit of an oversimplification and you tend to be a little more detailed about things. The more detailed and specific the better an argument will be though, with a broad statement of "Mannion has a better arm" it's easy to nit pick that and find flaws in the argument vs "On this play you can see Mannion take his drop back and look at him scan the field here"
I can do that with Goff with most plays, I can look and say "Right there he went to another read."... First rule of debate, you don't need to prove yourself right so much as prove the other person wrong. So when you and other posters say "Goff doesn't go through his progressions" I can pull up a play (and I already have one in mind) and say "Right there you can see him do it".
Bro what tape.? The tape thats says 0-7 5 tds against 7 interceptions that tape,? Come on. I don't need anything to fit my narrative I'm able to see what I see and call out what I see just because it's not the "popular" opinion amongst rams fan doesn't mean I have a narrative .
0-7 and 7 INT isn't tape, those are stat lines and they're from last year. Look at them now, look at the tape between the two in the preseason games that they've played it, that's the tape. The two videos I linked too earlier, that's the tape, that's the best way to judge the two QB's right now without going to practice like the coaches do, and that tape shows one QB clearly above the other, and it's Goff. That's why he's starting.
If you don't think Stan and Demoff and Snead wasn't told to try to develop Goff than that's on you. But if I spent all that draft capital you better believe I'm going to tell my head coach to give him every resource available to make it work. That's why I said it's now on Goff to show something to keep McVay invested on making sure he's the ONE.
Of course they told McVay to develop Goff, hopefully they didn't need to tell him that and he knew that he would need to develop him and wash all that stink off of him from last year. However, I don't think they told McVay that he needed to start Goff at all costs, and if the difference between QB's were even close to what you suggest they are, or if Mannion was indeed the better QB and we should write Goff off as a bust and roll with Mannion, I don't think that McVay would be going with Goff. It is on Goff to show something to indicate the investment was worth it, and so far Goff has been doing that. When the games count that's when we'll really get to the nitty gritty. I expect Goff to make mistakes, plenty of them at that, but if he can show that potential, that's what we want.
If the decision was yours to make you would have selected Mannion long ago. If it was that obvious then everyone else would likely be saying something, and McVay wouldn't be rolling with Goff. If he was then we made the wrong choice with our HC.
I think that's why you get so much resistance to your Goff vs Mannion posts.. That's at least what gives me the urge to jump in. Not because I dislike Mannion or think he's bad, but because your posts read like it's so obvious and blatant, but when we watch the film it's the opposite. Mannion is your dude, and I get that, but I'm just not seeing it... And apparently many, including McVay aren't either.