- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 24,041
This is the flaw in your theory, the franchise tag for an RB can only help raise salaries, cant detract from it.I can't give you an illustration of how it does work because we currently have the system we have. It's impossible for me to give you an example of it working, because the market created by the cap and franchise tag is what we're working with.
I also pointed out another reason the tag value is low.. we're just not seeing as many elite backs today.. so that top tier isn't deep enough with elite contracts to bring the value up. I bolded your part with that because I'm agreeing with that being a factor with the low franchise number.
Anyway, I get it, you disagree and think I'm factually wrong. Okay.
I just don't see it the same way.
There is a disparity in pay among the position, but its not due to franchise tags or 5th year options.
Every position has it's drop off point in salary, RB is around #10, TE #15-20, OT/OG #30, C #15-20, QB #15-20
It's also no secret that the highest paid RB's all got their big contract from re-signing with their own team. And in most cases, they got the big contract not in their last year but a season prior.
So the common thread I see among the 3 franchise RB is that each of them had monster '22 seasons, but questionable 20-21.