- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 41,753
![Mood: Youngblood](/data/addonflare/moods/uploads/100.png?1585480365)
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #661
View: https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/1105689239545696257
Minus of course the $14.5 million he missed out on last year.
He was afraid that if he signed a one-year franchise tag, that the Steelers would intentionally overuse him, and shorten his career. He's paranoid, but it's his career. And given the incredibly small amount of guaranteed money he was offered by the Steelers in the contract they offered before the franchise tag - he might be right. In any case, he has enough guaranteed money now to live high on the hog in his retirement if he's not foolish (yes, that's a longshot)
At his age, if he'd had a season ending injury even like Thomas... a broken leg and not ligament damage... he'd be lucky to get a one year deal and if he blew the lid off the league after that, get a middling deal.
heck, look at how LeGarrette Blount fared... dude was close to the league lead in yards, TDs and won Super Bowls with two different teams as a KEY parts of both offenses...and??? He never got paid as the feature back he was.
So much is about perception. Even Front Offices fall for that stuff.
What I don't hear mentioned is how this reflects on Mike Tomlin.
The outright inference is that Tomlin would run him like a rented mule knowing that he only had one more year, not giving a crap about his career or future earnings.
Sure, it's a business, but we all know there are different ways to do business. Win-win scenarios aren't fairy tales. They can and do happen.
This is a violent sport. I appreciate McVay more and more each day because it's clear that neither he nor Snead nor Demoff would ever do that to a player.
We typically release guys early so that they can get a good jump on FA and their next gig.
Far cry from what Martz did to Warner... sorry, not sure I'll ever be over that...
Except nobody is arguing that there isn't some depreciation. The point being made is dropping it a round is not an accurate valuation. The depreciation comes from your inability to immediately use it in a league where coaches, GMs, and players don't last long. But a second in five years is still a second. So the value of the commodity hasn't dropped. It's simply being discounted because you have to wait to use it.
The problem is that the conventional way of valuing it (dropping it a round for each year) is clearly inadequate. It has resulted in that commodity being undervalued again and again. Thus, we need to reassess how we value it. The conventional method clearly isn't working.
It’s an accurate way to value it in a trade scenario. They needed to quantify it somehow.
Watch out for us. I bet we're the NFCW team.
Ford had a good season - the best of his career. He's really had one other good season. And keep in mind that the Chief's opponents had to pass all the time to keep up with them. So that likely inflated his sack totals somewhat. He's a good player, but I don't know if he's worth over 9% of the cap. It wouldn't shock me if he never gets 13 sacks again.
Anyone think the jags would take a trade of peters and Reynolds for jalen Ramsey???
Would free up some money for us and allow us to pick the bones from the nfl cuts and as far as jam well peters is peters and with there pass rush and the way he likes to play works and in all honesty Reynolds is a poor mans Alshon Jeffery right now and foles likes that big target to throw it up too?
Or do you guys think they hang up on us lol
Watch out for us. I bet we're the NFCW team.
Thinking the same thing. Would we be losing Brockers in that scenario? Trying to make the numbers work here...
They quantified it wrong. It's not accurate.
Who? Whats the pros and cons on this guy?
Watch out for us. I bet we're the NFCW team.