Unless you guess wrong, and it wasn't a zero blitz, and the DC knew how you want to attack it and plans for that too.
I agree its the hardest thing.
But shit happens.
hence why it's the hardest position to play
Unless you guess wrong, and it wasn't a zero blitz, and the DC knew how you want to attack it and plans for that too.
I agree its the hardest thing.
But shit happens.
Say what you want about the kid, but man is he tough. He takes some highlight reel hits and gets up like a champ.
I believe it was closer to 145 v 471.it just sucks to lose when the other team had less than 200 yards of offense and we had a 7-0 lead.
Oh boy
the play caller has to act when the defense is in 0 blitz repeatedly...and it was repeated
I remember way, way back in the day when Patriots HoF G John Hannah was asked about the difference between Steve Grogan and Tony Eason. His reply was along the lines of "when Grogan drops back to pass, he looks for the receivers. When Eason drops back to pass, he looks for the pass rushers ... they should give him a skirt." This from a guy who blocked for both, but only respected one of them.
Goff could certainly do better in being aware of where the pressure is coming from, but at least he's not a pussy.
Well, I think we can all agree that McVay and Goff talked throughout the game on the sidelines. And McVay said they prepared for the zero blitzes.
Put those two together and then think about how many QBs have beaten blitzes without a coach like McVay...
For me it's on Goff. And while I'm no football genius, I would also endorse passing every play against a zero blitz - we have a $34 million QB and two $16 million WRs - for how good they are, I'd expect to destroy a zero blitz.
For sure.And I'm not at all trying to excuse his play for that game. He was bad.
But I think that kind of scenario shows that defenses get paid to know our answers.
When they have those answers, any QB can have a bad day.