- Joined
- Oct 16, 2013
- Messages
- 4,887
I hope I'm not one of those hypocritical ones? I'm not saying Goff would be any better without the supporting cast. I'm talking about very real flaws of Wentz.
Wentz has had two major injuries - once in his rookie year (to his forearm, if I'm not mistaken); the next in his MVP caliber season. His team flat out doesn't believe in him. He has serious accuracy issues that have been there since he got injured. He is a poor pocket passer, and without his previous mobility, he's a sitting duck with scattershot accuracy. He has flat-out refused anything that could help him.
Goff has not been badly injured in any game in his NFL career, and while he has his own major flaws, he at least looks like he can overcome them. Goff needs to learn to live another down, his poise against pressure needs work, he needs to learn how to navigate the pocket, and he cannot turn the ball over.
But Goff has the necessary tools to succeed: an arm that is accurate and strong, a resistance to injury, an even-keeled demeanor that goes to the next play, the confidence of his teammates and coach, and the drive to get better (i.e., admitting he has flaws, unlike Wentz.)
That's why the Goff/Wentz debate should be over. Wentz is a disappointment at best; a bust at worst. Goff...well, it remains to be seen, but he at least has the potential to be elite, but a floor of being a good enough quarterback to win with.
I don't think you are.
However, there's no way they win the Super Bowl without him so it does beg the question: how much is one Super Bowl win worth? Hopefully we win at least one and this won't be a discussion.