- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,002
- Name
- Dennis
Marlon McCree
I think it was Troy Brown who stripped him.
You're absolutely correct counselor, it was Troy Brown!
Marlon McCree
I think it was Troy Brown who stripped him.
If not Shanahan, then yeah Chucky does look possible. For the same reasons above, he knows how to leave well enough alone on the other side of the ball.
Is there any hard evidence that Fisher actually does mettle with the offense?? Seems like we run with that as fact round these parts, but I am not sure I have ever heard the coaches say as much. I know he hires some uninspiring (at least unknown) OCs though.
I don't think he meddles with is per se, at least not on a playcaling basis. But I'm sure he has high-level input into the gameplan, and he's the one that sets the overall philosophy of safety first, minimizing risks, and so on. And I would think in-game, he would be the one who would decide when it's time to sit on a lead.
Hell no. Gruden is one of the most overrated coaches in the NFL. He walked into two ideal situations with great rosters. He didn't build the teams in Oakland and Tampa. He eventually started tearing them down. Mainly because players didn't like playing for him and he regularly threw them under the bus when things went wrong.
I don't think Norv made this decision without a push. Minnesota was growing quite frustrated with his refusal to accept that his OL couldn't block well enough for Norv to run his vertically-oriented Air Coryell. Minnesota had the same issues the year before with Norv. I think it was a mutual parting of ways.
Look at who they hired to replace him. An OC known for the short passing game.
Shanahan would be OC. He'd have no say over the defense.
That's the opposite of how the Shanahan-Gibbs ZBS works. The Shanahan-Gibbs ZBS isn't designed to go through a specific gap. It's designed for the HB to determine the gap based on his vision and ability to press the LOS.
And Shanahan and his cohorts are known for being OL gurus.
It's the opposite, my friend. The power blocking scheme tells the HB which hole to run through. The HB can choose not to run through that hole. But it's designed to go through a certain hole.
And our blocking scheme hasn't changed over the past two years. It's been the same scheme for Gurley. We're a hybrid scheme. We run both power and zone blocking. Gurley doesn't lack freedom this year. Our OL just sucks at run blocking.
As for Norv's modern passing game, I have to disagree with that. Vikings fans have wanted Norv gone for years because he refused to adapt his passing scheme to what they had on offense. He continued to run deep drops and vertical passing concepts with a bad OL and a QB who didn't throw vertically well (Bridgewater).
Norv was a brilliant offensive mind. He still likely is. But he refuses to adapt to the modern game. He's actually a lot like Fisher. He's stuck in his ways.
Zimmer really isn't an uber-douche. We don't like him because of last year, but he's actually incredibly well-liked around the NFL by coaches and players alike.
Norv Turner is an upgrade over what we currently have. And Fisher being completely hands off with the offense would be an upgrade. However, Norv Turner isn't what I want in an OC if Fisher stays on.
I've heard some of that, and I'm sure there is at least a grain of truth to it. But that offense always has shorter routes built into it as well. Usually the QB progression is from the longer routes to the shorter ones, maybe he just didn't want to change that aspect, I don't know.
As for his replacement, they didn't have many choices to be sure.
I brainfarted on the HC thing, my bad.
I've seen it explained both ways, and it certainly looked like that's how Terrell Davis ran during his Broncos days. That being said, I'll defer some to you on this. On the other hand, it seems like Gurley this year, many times when there is room to run he instead runs right into the back of an offensive lineman. Did his vision disappear overnight, is he just lacking the patience, or is at least some of this design? I'm baffled.
If Shanahan came in as OC, I would certainly hope he wouldn't try to fit our lineman to a scheme that didn't suit them. They are big physical maulers, and that's what they should be doing.
I hate that we have a hybrid scheme at all, as I just don't think the guys we have are cut out for the ZBS at all. Furthermore, what really turns me off to it is this - virtually every one of our OL that have taken a snap this year has gotten worse at run blocking. In GRob's first two years, there wasn't much question about his run blocking ability, and in fact, there wasn't much question about it coming out of college. Now all of a sudden this year, a guy who is athletically gifted enough to be very good at it, who has had success in the past, and worked extra in the offseason, now he can't run block nearly as effectively. Saffold, Havenstein, Wichman, Brown ... all worse run blockers than the year before. If not explicitly scheme related, it's hard for me to believe it's not in large part coaching related.
I still think Norv's passing game is modern and adaptable to the present rules that make scoring easier. It just sounds to me like he didn't want to adapt to his circumstances, much like Josh McDaniel didn't during his lone year with the Rams (or Martz, for that matter, in his latter Rams years).
Fair enough on Zimmer, I'll admit my biases from that game last year color my opinion. Even knowing that, I just don't like the guy.
Outside of Norv, I'm just not sure who I want. If Shanahan could adapt to the OL we had instead of the smaller, more agile types he has preferred in the past, I could get on board. But at the end of the day, I'm just not sure how Fisher is going to attract a top notch OC to come here, because his job is going to be hanging in the balance next year even if he does get an extension.
Good reply, thanks for taking the time to write it.