Better Rams #1 overall pick: Bradford or Goff

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamDino

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
2,918
I think Gurley was a better back than Dickerson. ED might have been a slightly better runner... slightly..., but Gurley was a better receiver and blocker (and leader!).
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,411
Even when he went to Minnesota, he wasn't particularly good. He pulled an Alex Smith and put up numbers that look good on the surface in 2016, but their offense went nowhere because he checked it down nonstop. 2017 Case Keenum in that offense was very arguably better than 2016 Bradford. Sam was definitely a victim of his circumstances, but he wouldn't have been a superstar in better circumstances. IMO, in a good spot, he would have been similar to Alex Smith later in his career. Cautious game manager who doesn't lose you games but won't win you games either. I'd take Goff over Sam without thinking twice. Goff is prone to turnovers, but he has the balls to go win you games.

And I say this as a person who loved Bradford as a prospect and have to admit I was very wrong in hindsight.

Bradford still is the HIGHEST paid rookie EVER in The NFL.Bradford had some Bad luck.
I’ll just say if Goff was put in Bradford’s situation it would have been interesting.We already saw what Jared Goff looked like under Jeff Fisher his rookie season.
 

NJRamsFan

Please Delete
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
3,801
I’d honestly be interested in hearing a case made for Bradford being better because I just don’t see it.
 

NJRamsFan

Please Delete
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
3,801
Bradford still is the HIGHEST paid rookie EVER in The NFL.Bradford had some Bad luck.
I’ll just say if Goff was put in Bradford’s situation it would have been interesting.We already saw what Jared Goff looked like under Jeff Fisher his rookie season.
You do realize the highest paid rookie thing is due to NFL rule changes and not an accolade of Bradfords right?
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,163
I’d honestly be interested in hearing a case made for Bradford being better because I just don’t see it.
The only case that can be made is that it can't be known. Goff wasn't under the pressure that Bradford was, imo. Goff had a better Oline, weapons and a vastly superior OC/HC. He was 0-7 under Fisher. Sam had freakin' Spags and Fish for HC's. He had Shurmer, McDaniels and Schotty for his OC's, 3 offensive systems in three years and all of them sucked. To me, it can't be known. I probably pick Goff, but it's not a slam dunk.
 

NJRamsFan

Please Delete
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
3,801
The only case that can be made is that it can't be known. Goff wasn't under the pressure that Bradford was, imo. Goff had a better Oline, weapons and a vastly superior OC/HC. He was 0-7 under Fisher. Sam had freakin' Spags and Fish for HC's. He had Shurmer, McDaniels and Schotty for his OC's, 3 offensive systems in three years and all of them sucked. To me, it can't be known. I probably pick Goff, but it's not a slam dunk.
Yeah but that’s really just making excuses for Bradford (albeit valid ones) and saying what coulda shoulda woulda happened. In reality Goff was just flat out better. There’s an alternate timeline out there where Ryan Leaf dominated the NFL. But when asking who was better you have to examine what happened not what you think maybe coulda happened or who had it worse
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,163
Yeah but that’s really just making excuses for Bradford (albeit valid ones) and saying what coulda shoulda woulda happened. In reality Goff was just flat out better. There’s an alternate timeline out there where Ryan Leaf dominated the NFL. But when asking who was better you have to examine what happened not what you think maybe coulda happened or who had it worse
But context matters. The Goff we saw with less protection this last year is why we got rid of him. No protection, ever, was Bradfords reality for his whole term with the Rams. As important as the QB is, it's still a team sport. I like Goff's toughness more than Bradford's, but again, put Goff in Bradford's situation and I don't think we see much difference.
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,885
Not. Even. Close.

Dickerson by a country mile. Dude ran for 2105 on stacked boxes... it's not even close.

Now... Dickerson or Faulk? That's a conversation because they're such different backs that it's hard to compare... like comparing Jim Brown (best power back of all time, all due respect to the 1a: Earl Campbell) versus Barry Sanders (best shifty back of all time)

On pure aesthetics, it's Dickerson, hands down. He ran upright and guys on D would think they were lining him up for an epic smash and... he'd just glide right by. He was deceptively fast. Only guy I recall catching him from behind was Darrell Green.


Oh I agree.

Gurley was the best offensive player in 2018, on a Super Bowl team. Something that ED never was (on a Super Bowl team).

I agree that Goff was better than Bradford, but the Super Bowl doesn't have much to do with that equation. For the same reason that Gurley isn't put on Dickersons level despite his OPOY award and Super Bowl appearance.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,454
Name
Scott
But context matters. The Goff we saw with less protection this last year is why we got rid of him. No protection, ever, was Bradfords reality for his whole term with the Rams. As important as the QB is, it's still a team sport. I like Goff's toughness more than Bradford's, but again, put Goff in Bradford's situation and I don't think we see much difference.
Bradford was made of glass. Nuff said.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,725
Name
Jemma
When both were in their prime I'd go with Gurley.

He had home run speed Jackson only dreamed about.

You must be misremembering Jackson in his prime. Jackson broke quite a few long touchdowns where nobody caught him, he had the softest hands out of any Rams back not named Faulk (and at 6'2", 242 lbs.), and he was a vicious blocker. And unlike Gurley, Jackson was consistent enough to gain 1,000 rushing yards every year for eight consecutive seasons and did it all with no help aside from an aging Torry Holt.
 
Last edited:

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,885
Easily Jackson, even if you took out Gurley's injury history.


I see a lot of people saying that but I don't see it.

Even with Gurleys limited prime, I think his two best seasons are enough to put him over Jackson.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,725
Name
Jemma
I see a lot of people saying that but I don't see it.

Even with Gurleys limited prime, I think his two best seasons are enough to put him over Jackson.

Gurley had better offensive lines and players around him than Jackson, and I'd put up Jackson's 2006 season against anything Gurley did. And the consistency can't be ignored.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,411
You do realize the highest paid rookie thing is due to NFL rule changes and not an accolade of Bradfords right?

Okay Sherlock!! Good investigating.

I did see Bradford’s rookie season at the Stick live.The next STRIKE season was F”D up!! You go back & lock at not having an OFF Season with a New OC vs. Having Sean Mcvay & a full off season.

Ask me who is better. Jackie Slater or Andrew Whitworth?? I think if you go rewatch the movie blindside it might give you another clue about people & how they look upon the world. Figure out where your heart is.
I look back at Roger Saffolds career & The beef they had at the end of 2016.It wasn’t pretty. Whitworth has brought something pretty special to this Rams Franchise.
Spags talked a good game about Pillars.Andrew Whitworth us all of that. A pure mentor of Men as well as Sean Mcvay.They deal with issues & teammates while allowing the Diva & personalities to come out.

Suh vs Jason Pierre Paul
Spags won one with him & lost one with Paul(JPP)
Tom Brady won one with him & lost one against JPP.

It’s all Crack up on how you want to look at things.As In Hardknocks Sean Mcvay says let’s call a Spade a Spade.
 

NJRamsFan

Please Delete
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
3,801
But context matters. The Goff we saw with less protection this last year is why we got rid of him. No protection, ever, was Bradfords reality for his whole term with the Rams. As important as the QB is, it's still a team sport. I like Goff's toughness more than Bradford's, but again, put Goff in Bradford's situation and I don't think we see much difference.
That type of context only matters if you’re asking who COULD have been better, not who actually was. Sure looking at it your way could be a fun conversation but there’s no way for us to actually know we can only examine the body of work that each player put together and Goff’s was superior and it’s not close.

Playing out a hypothetical what if Bradford was on the McVay era rams and still suffered his signature seemingly endless season ending injury? You can’t blame it all on his o-line because while the rams o-lines he played behind were bad, he suffered season ending injuries at Oklahoma behind some of the best college o-lines ever (if I remember correctly.) at the end of the day nothing really matters if you can’t stay healthy.

Again I’m not trying to downplay the advantages Goff had bc of team or the disadvantages Bradford had due to team but again...Goff’s success as played out on the field was superior to Bradfords and that’s where this debate has to end.
 
Last edited:

NJRamsFan

Please Delete
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
3,801
Okay Sherlock!! Good investigating.

I did see Bradford’s rookie season at the Stick live.The next STRIKE season was F”D up!! You go back & lock at not having an OFF Season with a New OC vs. Having Sean Mcvay & a full off season.

Ask me who is better. Jackie Slater or Andrew Whitworth?? I think if you go rewatch the movie blindside it might give you another clue about people & how they look upon the world. Figure out where your heart is.
I look back at Roger Saffolds career & The beef they had at the end of 2016.It wasn’t pretty. Whitworth has brought something pretty special to this Rams Franchise.
Spags talked a good game about Pillars.Andrew Whitworth us all of that. A pure mentor of Men as well as Sean Mcvay.They deal with issues & teammates while allowing the Diva & personalities to come out.

Suh vs Jason Pierre Paul
Spags won one with him & lost one with Paul(JPP)
Tom Brady won one with him & lost one against JPP.

It’s all Crack up on how you want to look at things.As In Hardknocks Sean Mcvay says let’s call a Spade a Spade.
I’m honestly confused about a lot of the points you’re making as I didn’t address any of that stuff

I was simply responding to the fact that you capitalized the fact that Bradford is still the HIGHEST paid rookie qb EVER as if it was an accomplishment of his. Every year there was a new highest paid rookie qb ever until the NFL introduced the rookie wage scale which is the only reason Bradford remains the highest. It’s not some career milestone. It’s a rule change.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,693
I see a lot of people saying that but I don't see it.

Even with Gurleys limited prime, I think his two best seasons are enough to put him over Jackson.
Injuries suck, plain and simple. Only far to compare players at their best. I mean, is anyone going to say Frank Gore was better then Gayle Sayers?
Gurley over Jackson hands down
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,257
Goff but not by much. So much has to do with the situation a player comes into. Shurmur turning Bradford into a check down machine didn't develop him. Goff would have gone the same disastrous route had Fisher remained head coach. I expect Goff to have a Bradford like career from here on out. He will play well enough to stick on some teams, may impress some years, maybe even get traded for a first round pick. But won't be considered a top QB in the league.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,693
I’m honestly confused about a lot of the points you’re making as I didn’t address any of that stuff

I was simply responding to the fact that you capitalized the fact that Bradford is still the HIGHEST paid rookie qb EVER as if it was an accomplishment of his. Every year there was a new highest paid rookie qb ever until the NFL introduced the rookie wage scale which is the only reason Bradford remains the highest. It’s not some career milestone. It’s a rule change.
At one point, Goff had signed for the most guaranteed money ever, didnt last long though