-X-
Medium-sized Lebowski
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
I don't know that you can compare a GM making one draft pick over another with a COO/VP hiring the people who make those kinds of decisions, but I understand what you're trying to get at. If this new group doesn't pan out, and he didn't meddle in their business, should he be afforded another shot? That's your question. I don't see why not. I mean, you still haven't given me any compelling evidence that suggests doing it that way is the wrong way. The alternative to what he's doing is for him to just insert himself as GM also. Like John Schneider in Seattle. Then he has culpability beyond hiring the staff and giving them the latitude to build the program. He'd actually be largely responsible for personnel as well.Here's an example I'll give to illustrate my point: In the 2006 draft Reggie Bush was a slam dunk for the first overall pick. He was billed as the next Marshall Faulk. The Texans had the first pick in the draft and everybody thought they should take him. Instead they picked Mario Williams. History shows they made the right choice. Point being just because Demoff picked highly sought after guys doesn't absolve him from the fact he picked guys who couldn't get the job done. His job is to do all the work to make the right move and be judged on the move. He has hired another guy and is getting high praise for the move. We'll see if it pans out. If it doesn't should he be afforded another chance? If not why? He landed a highly sought after coach and that's what matters
I guess what you're saying is that by not being more directly involved in developing the program, he's holding the Rams back?
I mean, I guess you can make that case. I just don't subscribe to the theory is all.