Gurley was hurt and contributed little to our 55 point explosion vs the Chiefs. He also was mostly replaced by another RB for the remainder of the Super Bowl run. In fact he was a liability vs the Saints, though Goff found a way move the offense and win the NFC Championship without Gurley.
The offense struggles began in 2019 due to the decimated Oline.
Cutting Gurley was the right move as he was washed up due to injury.
Notice from one side of your mouth you blame Goff for the offensive struggles then the other side you say you are fascinated by fans becoming fans of the QB.
So either the QB deserves lots of credit for success or he doesn’t, which one is it?
If the Rams traded Donald Tomorrow under the Goff scenario I would react exactly the same way, so clearly it has to do with fans perceived value of player and the organizations handling of it.
Read the underlined portion again. This is not a true statement. Every system, every team is different. It's never going to be black and white, so this blanket statement doesn't work.
It requires an honest look at what the talent around the team is.
Here's an example using the same player, Peyton Manning deserved little to no credit for the Broncos most recent Super Bowl win. But Peyton Manning deserved most of the credit for the Colts most recent Super Bowl win. I don't think many people would disagree with those examples.
The problem is that when someone becomes a fan of a player, their perspective becomes skewed. Because they want said player to be successful, they start blaming other entities when things are going wrong - coach, OL, and the WRs. There were a handful of people who wanted Goff to fail - although honestly I'm not sure if there are actually any still here, they seem to get banned - but most of the arguing was done between people who wanted Goff to succeed and people who wanted the Rams to succeed. People will say they wanted both, but you can't be objective once you like a single player that much. QBs tend to have this effect on all fan bases unfortunately.
When Goff played well, he deserved credit. When he played poorly, he deserved the blame. If he played poorly in a win, he still didn't deserve credit for it. If a team wins a game 52-49 and the defense couldn't stop the other team, the coaches aren't going to review that game with the defense and say "well we won so no worries about all those blown assignments guys".
I'm fine giving a player some credit for team success as long as the player is also knocked for playing poorly in a win. For example, the Browns game in 2019 was a really bad one for Goff, but we won.
The Vikings game in 2018 was an awful one for the defense, but we won.
In both these cases, neither deserved credit for the win IMO.