- Joined
- Jun 3, 2014
- Messages
- 5,342
Why do you think that was?The running game was not really that good. It was pretty average
Why do you think that was?The running game was not really that good. It was pretty average
He was? Cause we just replaced him after 3/4s of a single year. After replacing the first guy after 3/4s of a year.
Why do you think that was?
Not a replacement a compliment. Tre is good but Gurely has the talent to be great. You don't just pass that up for a questionable OT prospect that would play RT. Same o-line value will be in rd 2.
If we were to get Clemmings or Cann in the second they would be as good as any Olineman we could of got at 10. For what its worth, I think the Rams feel like Barksdale is coming back and Blaylock is still out there.
As Legatron4 said, I think I'd feel better if he wasn't seriously injured already.
You might when that great talent has a blown knee. And I don't think Peat and Flowers qualify as questionable. At least any more questionable than a blown knee. Either way go Rams it's in the books now.
View attachment 6155 OH MY GOD PLEASE freak OFF. I'm so sick of this crap it's really, really frustrating and I'm gunna freaking knock someone out.
Senator... we're not done yet... another follow up, if I may...Because they have a bunch of average players. Gurley is not average so this is a start. I know where you are going with this this and any pick at 10 would on the line would of been average at best, so I think I answered your potential follow up question too lol.
That wasn't directed at you. We just happened to post at the same time lol Its frustrating to see us neglect the same problems year after year. The things they're doing haven't worked yet. Maybe I would feel better if Gurley didn't shred his knee 8 months ago.
Unfortunately, that still doesn't do much for me... one is average (at best) and the other is old with an injury history. I've seen this movie and it doesn't end well.
I'm not sure, but I think you made my point?What do you suggest in the short term then? You are not going to draft a guy that is better than Barksdale next year. I can say with little doubt that the Rams will draft an offensive lineman in the next 3 rounds.
Personally I would draft Cann or Clemmings in the 2nd and depth in the 4th. Hope Robinson can improve, keep Saffold on the right and sign Barksdale.
LT Robinson
LG Cann
C Rhaney, Jones, Barnes
RG Saffold
RT Barksdale
Let Gurley run behind Robinson and Cann. Whoever loses out at C provides some depth at G. Reynolds is your back up at T and maybe you draft another guy in the 4th to provide additional depth and competition.
Its not perfect, but its the start of the solution. Everyone wants the line to be fixed overnight but what are the solutions? We can complain but realistically its going to take more that a wave of a magic wand.
Senator... we're not done yet... another follow up, if I may...
Remember when a very high percentage of Rams fans were ecstatic about Austin? Said he was "elite" talent? Media loved him?
So... what happened?
But when you can get a Jake Fisher, Clemmings, or a AJ Cann that have almost the exact same amount of talent in 2nd rd and a player with elite talent doesn't that make more sense that two 2nd tier prospects? You and I clearly differ on our Flowers and Peat opinions but I'd rather have Barksdale back then either one of those guys.