Rams tried to trade up for Ashton Gillotte in round 3
- RAMS / NFL TALK
- 26 Replies
I think they may have wanted Gillotte because he’s more of a Hoecht build. Stewart is on the small side.Of course trading up isn't always a bad thing. In this particular instance though I prefer the player we ended up with, but the story hasn't even started there so we'll see how it turns out.
Other than that, like you mentioned before a potential trade of a future late 2nd for a present early 3rd would obviously be a steal for the Rams if that was the case. However if the media is correct about 2026 being a much stronger class, I still don't like the idea of trading that draft capital. Iirc the media at this time last year was saying 2025 would be a weaker class than 2024 and they appeared to have been right about that.
I also didn't like trading the future 4th, but that's a bit more amenable as a mid round pick imo.
After they traded up for Fiske they said, or it was reported that they didn’t really like any of the DL options that would be left on the board, and they had a higher grade on Fiske, than where they ended up picking him. So, if they had a late first round grade on Fiske, that trade for a future second round pick was a steal. Maybe this was a similar situation.
Plus in a weak class and few needs it makes sense to trade up. If they were willing to give up next years second round pick for Gillotte they must have had a pretty high grade on him.