- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 6,141
The injury history of our dynamic duo is a little concerning but I wouldn't exactly say we're needy.Are we a WR needy team?
The injury history of our dynamic duo is a little concerning but I wouldn't exactly say we're needy.Are we a WR needy team?
Fair enough. I didn't go back and verify but I thought we've at least discussed the possibility before if that did not actually happen. Maybe I'm flat out wrong and was thinking about another position.Has there been a time when McVay has only carried 5 WRs on the roster? I can't recall that ever happening. I remember 6 and even 7 one or two years. But only 5? Makes sense not to running 11 personnel about 90% of the time.
With them likely keeping 3 QBs. After Garrapola's suspension is over, they need to go light somewhere.Fair enough. I didn't go back and verify but I thought we've at least discussed the possibility before if that did not actually happen. Maybe I'm flat out wrong and was thinking about another position.
Interesting. What makes you think so?I also believe the Rams are going with more 12 personnel this year with 2 TE's and 2 WR's so you have to factor that in too.
He would take up a lot of cap space. Can we afford someone like him before Donald's contract is off the books?Tee Higgens hasn't signed his franchise tag or shown up for any OTAs. To bad we don't have our second next year. He would put this WR room up to the best in the league and give Stafford that big downfield and redzone threat they have been looking for. Of course to resign him that would probably mean we can't afford to keep Kupp for much longer.
With the retooling of the Offensive Line I believe the Rams are more committed to the run game and with that, IMO, the 12 personnel with an extra TE aids more in the run game. Now McVay's schemes require the WR's to block, but IMO, having Parkinson & Allen or Long in the game would provide some better opportunities for Williams & Corum so my feeling is more 12 personnel with an increase in running the football.Interesting. What makes you think so?
He would take up a lot of cap space. Can we afford someone like him before Donald's contract is off the books?
When has Stafford said he wants more money?I'm sure it would be tough with Stafford wanting more money but where theres a will theres a way.
When has Stafford said he wants more money?
All I saw was that he wants more guaranteed money, which doesnt affect the cap one bit. If he's paid say 40 mill, it doesnt change the cap if it was guaranteed or not
And even if they were, how does he fit?Are we a WR needy team?
Thanks for the explanation.With the retooling of the Offensive Line I believe the Rams are more committed to the run game and with that, IMO, the 12 personnel with an extra TE aids more in the run game. Now McVay's schemes require the WR's to block, but IMO, having Parkinson & Allen or Long in the game would provide some better opportunities for Williams & Corum so my feeling is more 12 personnel with an increase in running the football.
Plus TE's Coach Nick Caley is the new Pass Game Coordinator so I also expect some play action passes to the TE's in the set too.
"I'm ready, coach! Put me in!" ~ Nelson SpruceI love this idea.
Burks is 24… Woods was 25 when we grabbed him pre-Josh Allen.
I prefer a Douglas Fir over a Spruce."I'm ready, coach! Put me in!" ~ Nelson Spruce
also believe the Rams are going with more 12 personnel this year with 2 TE's and 2 WR's
He's staying active and fresh with Tony Banks in Kansas."I'm ready, coach! Put me in!" ~ Nelson Spruce
Because there is no place like home.He's staying active and fresh with Tony Banks in Kansas.
Thanks for the explanation.
Although, I am wondering if the 11 personnel brings on more NIckel coverage and lighter Boxes than the 12 personnel.